2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.06.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrogen/air supersonic combustion for future hypersonic vehicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
38
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…inlet/isolator, supersonic combustor and expander/nozzle, while modeling of the integrated flow path in a full-scale combustion is generally scarce. From the literature, the most preferred modeling cases are the HyperShot I&II [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] and SCHOLAR [11][12][13][14][15][16], due a large degree to their relative complete data on experimental setup and measurements 2 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics for model validation. Simulations based on the experimental cases tested on some other scramjet combustor facilities, such as the DLR scramjet combustor [17,18], the University of Virginia's Supersonic Combustion Facility (SCF) [18][19][20][21] and the CUBRC Combustion Duct [22], are also growing vigorously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…inlet/isolator, supersonic combustor and expander/nozzle, while modeling of the integrated flow path in a full-scale combustion is generally scarce. From the literature, the most preferred modeling cases are the HyperShot I&II [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] and SCHOLAR [11][12][13][14][15][16], due a large degree to their relative complete data on experimental setup and measurements 2 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics for model validation. Simulations based on the experimental cases tested on some other scramjet combustor facilities, such as the DLR scramjet combustor [17,18], the University of Virginia's Supersonic Combustion Facility (SCF) [18][19][20][21] and the CUBRC Combustion Duct [22], are also growing vigorously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, the detailed mechanisms for small-molecule fuels (C 1 -and C 2 -based) consist of less than one hundred species, while largemolecule Jet fuels (C >10 -based) consist of hundreds of or even thousands of species. For this reason, current supersonic combustion modelings are mostly based on hydrogen fuel [24, [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] and only a small portion of them are based on small-molecule hydrocarbon fuels (.g. ethylene [49,50], methane [51,52] and acetone [53]).…”
Section: B Kerosene Mechanism Reduction and Turbulent Combustion Modmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its promising performance at flight Mach numbers higher than seven, the supersonic ramjet (also known as scramjet) fueled with hydrogen has been extensively studied over the past decades (Cecere et al, 2011). Compared with those fueled with liquid hydrocarbons, employing hydrogen in scramjets mitigates the technical difficulties of atomizing, vaporizing, mixing, and igniting liquid fuels in a supersonic combustor flow that has a short residence time of a millisecond or less (Ben-Yakar et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%