Muonium, a positive muon and an electron, is often used as an experimentally accessible substitute for hydrogen in materials research. In semiconductors and insulators, a large amount of information on the hydrogen behavior is deduced from this analogy; however, it is seldom demonstrated that this procedure is justified. We show here, via a comparison of the hyperfine interactions, that in TiO 2 muonium and hydrogen form the same configuration with the same basic electronic structure. A detailed description of the bonding characteristics of the muon to the Ti 3+ polaron is presented. The special role of muon motion within the so-called oxygen channel in the rutile structure, which occurs at a lower temperature than for hydrogen, is emphasized. Muonium (Mu) is a pseudoisotope of hydrogen in which the proton is replaced by a positive muon (μ + ), with a factor of 9 lighter mass. Muon spin spectroscopy (μSR) uses muons implanted with 100% spin polarization and offers a very sensitive method to study the properties of this isolated pseudohydrogen in solids [1,2]. It is usually assumed that information obtained from μSR can be transferred with appropriate modifications to H. However, overlapping experiments to support this assumption are scarce. A particularly relevant case is the doping character of H in semiconductors and oxides [3][4][5][6], where practically all calculations refer to the electronic structure of H whereas most experimental information comes from μSR [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Overlapping data exist only for ZnO where proton-ENDOR (electron-nuclear double resonance) data [14] can be compared directly with μSR results [15][16][17][18]. A number of properties (e.g., ionization energy) are indeed similar for the two species. However, the measured hyperfine interaction (hfi), scaled with the magnetic moments, differs by almost a factor of 10. This raised the question of whether the same configuration is measured, or if the H center may involve an additional defect [19,20].Here, we report a case where the same configuration can be established for H and Mu. We compare the hfi of the μSR experiment with the proton-ENDOR result, both for rutile TiO 2 . The H center in TiO 2 was extensively studied by Brant et al.[21] using electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) and ENDOR, who found that the electron is located at the Ti ion reducing it from Ti 4+ to Ti 3+ . H is bound to one of the six O atoms surrounding Ti and the magnetic interaction between the proton and the electron is mainly dipolar. This specific hfi permits a sensitive comparison of the two experiments. We have observed a dramatic change of the μSR spectra with increasing temperature and a complete disappearance of the hyperfine splitting at 10 K. We show that this is due to rapid jumps of the muon between neighboring bonding positions to O atoms around Ti 3+ . The very strong angle dependence of the dipolar interaction and the averaging over values in different * ruivilao@fis.uc.pt positions lead to the reduction and final disappearance of the hfi...