2018
DOI: 10.1002/prs.11965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrogen jet vapor cloud explosion: A model for predicting blast size and application to risk assessment

Abstract: Releases of hydrogen at elevated pressures form turbulent jets in unconfined & uncongested regions may trigger vapor cloud explosion (VCE) as well as jet fire hazards. In the case of a delayed ignition of an unconfined & uncongested jet the turbulence induced by the jet release can lead to flame speeds sufficient to produce damaging blast loads, even in the absence of confinement or congestion. The VCE hazard posed by such high‐pressure hydrogen releases is not well‐recognized. The authors have previously pres… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high-pressure hydrogen horizontal tests described above, Daubech et al 15,16 Additional FLACS modeling of ambient temperature 2 in. subsonic methane horizontal releases (294 K methane and air temperature, F stability 1.9 m/s, Surface roughness 0.18 m) has also been performed to further test the validity of the ground effect approach for modeling the ground effect, across a range of velocities at 10 and 226 m/s (Mach 0.02 and 0.5), Figures 13 and 14.…”
Section: Jet Interaction With Groundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The high-pressure hydrogen horizontal tests described above, Daubech et al 15,16 Additional FLACS modeling of ambient temperature 2 in. subsonic methane horizontal releases (294 K methane and air temperature, F stability 1.9 m/s, Surface roughness 0.18 m) has also been performed to further test the validity of the ground effect approach for modeling the ground effect, across a range of velocities at 10 and 226 m/s (Mach 0.02 and 0.5), Figures 13 and 14.…”
Section: Jet Interaction With Groundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At further out locations, this would not have been true due to buoyancy and ground effects discussed later in this paper, where these test results are discussed in more detail. Figure 7 shows the comparison between the data, FLACS simulations16 and Ventjet modeling results. Ventjet with α 1 = 0.08 provides the best fit.…”
Section: Selection Of Entrainment Constantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More in general, the authors of [37] examine the effect of the geometrical shape of the flammable cloud on the explosion, analyzing a constant volume of clouds with different height-width ratios and length-width ratios. Other works, as in [13], focus on the prediction of the VCE blast resulting from the leakage of a specific material.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, various risk assessment software programs have been used to determine the safety distance and risk of explosion through simulation analysis studies on hydrogen facilities [22,23]. For example, a study was conducted to determine the safety distance of a hydrogen refueling station facility by calculating the jet flame length using HyRAM [24], and a study was conducted to identify and establish hydrogen explosion locations using the FLACS-CFD software [25]. In addition, studies have been conducted to analyze the damage effect of jet flames using Phast and Safeti [26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%