2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.diamond.2010.02.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrogen passivation of boron acceptors in as-grown boron-doped CVD diamond epilayers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here it must be stated that the samples have had distinct growth temperatures: the non‐centered sample always presented a growth temperature ∼900 °C, whereas the centered sample had an additional 10–25 °C above it. Additionally, from the CL data no clear evidence of boron compensation by donors and/or hydrogen‐induced boron passivation is seen 13, 14.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Here it must be stated that the samples have had distinct growth temperatures: the non‐centered sample always presented a growth temperature ∼900 °C, whereas the centered sample had an additional 10–25 °C above it. Additionally, from the CL data no clear evidence of boron compensation by donors and/or hydrogen‐induced boron passivation is seen 13, 14.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In the optical-range extended defects related to the A-band, point defects are well-known from published studies and charts [92]. During the last two decades, CL has been demonstrated [93] to be an exceptional tool to evaluate the doping level [94] with an accuracy one order of magnitude better than secondary ion mass spectroscopy (SIMS). It also allows determining the type of point defects present in the crystal as H3 that are generated in the mid-gap [95].…”
Section: Structural Characterization Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lett. 103, 042104 (2013) in SIMS measurements, [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] leading to systematic overestimates of the real width, similar to the case of silicon. 26 If this is the case, it is legitimate to ask how the layer thickness should be estimated from broadened SIMS profiles.…”
Section: -3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Doping level evaluation over micrometer-scale areas in diamond material can also be carried out by optical methods such as Raman 10 and FTIR. 11 Among these techniques, cathodoluminescence (CL) 12,13 is clearly the most sensitive 14 while ensuring a high spatial resolution since cross sectional analysis can be also carried out on FIB preparations. 15,16 However, the signal is too weak in heavily doped diamond to image the spatial distribution of dopants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%