2016
DOI: 10.3133/sir20155183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrogeological framework, numerical simulation of groundwater flow, and effects of projected water use and drought for the Beaver-North Canadian River alluvial aquifer, northwestern Oklahoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hydraulic conductivity for the Permian bedrock units was assumed to be constant at 0.003 ft/d and was comparable to hydraulic conductivity estimates for Permian shale units in southwest Oklahoma reported by Sullivan (1998). The specific storage and anisotropy values for the Permian bedrock units were assumed to be constant at 0.00001 and 10, respectively; these values were comparable to those used by Ryter and Correll (2016) and Ellis and others (2017) for Permian bedrock units in northwest Oklahoma. …”
Section: Hydraulic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The hydraulic conductivity for the Permian bedrock units was assumed to be constant at 0.003 ft/d and was comparable to hydraulic conductivity estimates for Permian shale units in southwest Oklahoma reported by Sullivan (1998). The specific storage and anisotropy values for the Permian bedrock units were assumed to be constant at 0.00001 and 10, respectively; these values were comparable to those used by Ryter and Correll (2016) and Ellis and others (2017) for Permian bedrock units in northwest Oklahoma. …”
Section: Hydraulic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…This difference could be caused in part by streambed seepage between Carter (07301500) and Lake Altus that was not estimated in the conceptual model. Saturated-zone ET for the calibrated numerical model, which was estimated by using many assumptions, was about 40 percent greater than that of the conceptual model (but less than the saturated-zone ET for the similar Reach I calibrated numerical models of Ryter and Correll [2016] and Ellis and others [2017]). The 67-percent (about 4,800-acre-ft/yr) increase in simulated lateral flow, seeps, and springs as compared to the conceptual model reflects uncertainty in estimating these components without published flow rates.…”
Section: Calibrated Water Budgetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Higher water levels in the surrounding bedrock than in the alluvial deposits indicates that the Canadian River has incised down into the bedrock, with base-flow seepage from bedrock units through the alluvial deposits to the river being part of this hydrologic system. This incision was not observed in the Beaver-North Canadian River alluvial aquifer (Ryter and Correll, 2016). Groundwater in the alluvial deposits typically flows subparallel and downstream with streamflow.…”
Section: Water-table Surface In 2013mentioning
confidence: 99%