2010
DOI: 10.1029/2009wr008965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrologic evaluation of Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis standard precipitation products in basins beyond its inclined latitude band: A case study in Laohahe basin, China

Abstract: [1] Two standard Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA) products, 3B42RT and 3B42V6, were quantitatively evaluated in the Laohahe basin, China, located within the TMPA product latitude band (50°NS) but beyond the inclined TRMM satellite latitude band (36°NS). In general, direct comparison of TMPA rainfall estimates to collocated rain gauges from 2000 to 2005 show that the spatial and temporal rainfall characteristics over the region are well captured by the 3B42… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
210
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 259 publications
(216 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
5
210
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results reveal that a hydrological model can amplify uncertainties in input data but also reduce uncertainties, which may be due to the nonlinear runoff generation process in hydrological models. This finding is consistent with the research by Yong et al (2010).…”
Section: Daily-scale Dischargessupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results reveal that a hydrological model can amplify uncertainties in input data but also reduce uncertainties, which may be due to the nonlinear runoff generation process in hydrological models. This finding is consistent with the research by Yong et al (2010).…”
Section: Daily-scale Dischargessupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Several studies have been carried out to analyse the uncertainty of TRMM in high-latitude regions (Yong et al, 2010(Yong et al, , 2014Chen et al, 2013a;Zhao and Yatagai, 2014), but studies in northeast China are few. Evaluation of GLDAS data has generally been limited to the United States and other observationrich regions of the world (Kato et al, 2007); assessments and applications in other regions are rare (Wang et al, 2011;Zhou et al, 2013).…”
Section: W Qi Et Al: Evaluation Of Global Fine-resolution Precipitamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is a typical scale mismatch issue between point-based rain gauge data and the gridded precipitation products [22]. Many interpolation methods (inverse distance weighting, kriging, spline, and Thiessen polygon for example) [22,33,53] and grid-to-point techniques (such as nearest neighbor, bilinear weighted interpolation) [41] have been proposed to compare the point-based rain gauge data and pixel-based satellite precipitation data. Each method has its advantages and disadvantages, and its performance depends on various factors and varies from region to region [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The r was used to quantify the type of correlation and dependence between satellite products and gauge observations in fundamental statistics. The RB and RRMSE were used to describe the bias and error of satellite precipitation compared with gauge observations [33][34][35]. The equations of the indicators are as follows:…”
Section: Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current operational Version-7 TMPA system produces two standard user-level (Level 3) rainfall products at relatively fine resolution (0.25˝ˆ0.25˝, 3 h), i.e., the real-time 3B42RT (hereafter referred to as "RTV7"; 6-9 h after observation time) for the latitude band 60˝N-60˝S and the gauge-adjusted, post-real-time 3B42V7 for research purposes (hereafter "V7"; two months latency) with spatial coverage of 50˝N-50˝S [5,6]. Recently, these two quasi-global satellite precipitation products have been widely utilized in various hydrological and meteorological applications in China [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Over the years, there have been many efforts to compare and validate available satellite precipitation estimates at global, regional, or basin scales [9,10,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%