2017
DOI: 10.5194/hess-21-3543-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrological modeling of the Peruvian–Ecuadorian Amazon Basin using GPM-IMERG satellite-based precipitation dataset

Abstract: Abstract. In the last two decades, rainfall estimates provided by the Tropical Rainfall Measurement Mission (TRMM) have proven applicable in hydrological studies. The Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission, which provides the new generation of rainfall estimates, is now considered a global successor to TRMM. The usefulness of GPM data in hydrological applications, however, has not yet been evaluated over the Andean and Amazonian regions. This study uses GPM data provided by the Integrated Multi-satelli… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
36
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study found that IMERG-F V05 and 3B42V7 have acceptable hydrological capabilities in the Chindwin River basin, with IMERG-F being slightly better than 3B42V7. Similar findings were reported in the Ganjiang River basin [45], Beijiang River basin [24], upper Mekong River basin [36], Mishui basin [25], Yellow River source region of China [44], and Amazon basin of Peru and Ecuador [48]. Yuan et al [47] employed the first hydrological evaluation research in the Chindwin River basin and found that IMERG-F V03 performs comparatively worse than 3B42V7 in daily streamflow simulations.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Hydrological Performance Of the Gpm-era Sppssupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our study found that IMERG-F V05 and 3B42V7 have acceptable hydrological capabilities in the Chindwin River basin, with IMERG-F being slightly better than 3B42V7. Similar findings were reported in the Ganjiang River basin [45], Beijiang River basin [24], upper Mekong River basin [36], Mishui basin [25], Yellow River source region of China [44], and Amazon basin of Peru and Ecuador [48]. Yuan et al [47] employed the first hydrological evaluation research in the Chindwin River basin and found that IMERG-F V03 performs comparatively worse than 3B42V7 in daily streamflow simulations.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Hydrological Performance Of the Gpm-era Sppssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…techniques. However, most relevant studies [24,25,36,45,47,48,50] focused on assessing the hydrological utility of IMERG at daily or monthly time scales, while evaluations at sub-daily temporal scales have seldom been reported [44,46,49]. Furthermore, studies on the hydrological performance of all the "Early", "Late", and "Final" runs of IMERG are rare [24,25,50].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(). TRMM products have also been used as an input for hydrological models (e.g.Getirana et al, ; Paiva et al, ; Guimberteau et al, ), the results of which confirm the capability of this data source to reproduce the hydrological cycle in the southern part of the Peruvian Amazon (Zubieta et al, , ). However, additional studies concerning the validation of satellite‐based rainfall estimations in Amazonia are necessary, especially at the intra‐seasonal timescale, which has not yet been documented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To appropriate use of satellite precipitation data sets, it needed understanding the nature of their estimated errors. The satellite precipitation products (TMPA, CMORPH among others) estimate appropriated the rainfall over some Amazonian and Andean regions (Buarque et al, 2011;Zulkafli et al, 2014;Zubieta et al, 2015;Paccini et al, 2017;Zubieta et al, 2017b). Nonetheless, the error obtained is probably associated with the evolution of the precipitation and the accumulated errors from the sub-daily estimation provided by each component of the satellite (Turk et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the AB, most assessments of satellite-based precipitation estimates are usually described in the literature as follows: (a) the estimated precipitation rates are compared with in situ observations (Buarque et al, 2011;Condom et al, 2011;Scheel et al, 2011;Ward et al, 2011;Zulkafli et al, 2014). (b) The estimated rainfall is used as input to hydrological modelling experiments, and simulated streamflows are evaluated against observations (Collischonn et al, 2007;Getirana et al, 2010;Behrangi et al, 2011;Paiva et al, 2011;Guimberteau et al, 2012;Zulkafli et al, 2014;Zubieta et al, 2015;Wongchuig-Correa et al, 2017;Zubieta et al, 2017b). (c) The estimated precipitation variability is compared to in situ observations about atmospheric circulation patterns at synoptic and intraseasonal timescale (Paccini et al, 2017;Mayta et al, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%