2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2016.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrological simulation in a basin of typical tropical climate and soil using the SWAT model part I: Calibration and validation tests

Abstract: Pomba river basin Maximum annual daily streamflows Minimum annual daily streamflow Split sample test Proxy basin test a b s t r a c t Study region: The study was developed for fhe Pomba River Basin, which is located in southeast region of Brazil in the continent of South America. Study focus: This study aimed to (a) calibrate and validate the SWAT model for a sub-basin of Pomba River Basin, (b) validate it for use with upstream and downstream control sections and (c) validate it for sub-basins other than the o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
1
11

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
24
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The results showed a good agreement between the observed and simulation values for calibration and validation periods, with R 2 and E NS indicated in Table 4. According to Pereira et al [45], the model performance for sediment yield estimation was in the satisfactory range. The model performance efficiency for the calibration and validation periods was lower for the Ketar River as compared to the Meki River.…”
Section: Assessment Of Swat Model Performance Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results showed a good agreement between the observed and simulation values for calibration and validation periods, with R 2 and E NS indicated in Table 4. According to Pereira et al [45], the model performance for sediment yield estimation was in the satisfactory range. The model performance efficiency for the calibration and validation periods was lower for the Ketar River as compared to the Meki River.…”
Section: Assessment Of Swat Model Performance Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For the purpose of this study, performance efficiency as recommended by Ayele et al [25] and Pereira et al [45] was used. The objective function can be further elaborated quantitatively and qualitatively as: E NS > 0.75 (good); 0.36 < E NS < 0.75 (satisfactory); and E NS < 0.36 (unsatisfactory).…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysis Calibration and Validation Of Swat Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More physically based and complex models such as soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) were also widely applied for simulating hydrologic behaviour of tropical catchments (Pereira, Martinez, Pruski, & da Silva, 2016, for an example from Brazil). However, Kirchner (2006) pointed out that successful hydrograph simulations for smaller catchments can be misleading and often result in overfitted complex models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Nossent, Elsen and Bauwens (2011) the most sensitive parameters were CN2, CH_N and GWQMN for stream flow calibration. Pereira et al (2016) worked in the Pomba River basin in southeastern Brazil and identified SOL_K, APLHA_BF, ESCO, CN2, CH_N2, SOL_AWC and SOL_Z as sensitive parameters. For Andrade, Mello and Beskow (2013) the most sensitive parameters found for the Jaguara River Basin in the Rio Grande High region of Minas Gerais were CN2, ALPHA_BF, RCHRG_DP, ESCO, SOL_Z, SOL_K, SOL_AWC.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%