2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.pocean.2022.102949
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrology and small pelagic fish drive the spatio–temporal dynamics of springtime zooplankton assemblages over the Bay of Biscay continental shelf

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is room, however, to improve the characterization of changes in resource availability and their impact in anchovy size, including changes in prey capture efficiency (Ljungström et al., 2020), or a potential reduction in food quality (Brosset et al., 2017; Menu et al., 2023). There is evidence of changes in the structure of zooplankton communities in the Bay of Biscay, including an increase in warming tolerant copepod species (Valdés et al., 2021; see also Grandremy, Romagnan, et al., 2023). Potential changes in the size structure of plankton are another possibility worth considering (e.g., Grandremy, Bourriau, et al., 2023; Vandromme et al., 2014), given the well‐known effect of prey sizes on the growth and dynamics of small pelagics (e.g., Rykaczewski, 2019; Rykaczewski & Checkley, 2008; Thoral et al., 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is room, however, to improve the characterization of changes in resource availability and their impact in anchovy size, including changes in prey capture efficiency (Ljungström et al., 2020), or a potential reduction in food quality (Brosset et al., 2017; Menu et al., 2023). There is evidence of changes in the structure of zooplankton communities in the Bay of Biscay, including an increase in warming tolerant copepod species (Valdés et al., 2021; see also Grandremy, Romagnan, et al., 2023). Potential changes in the size structure of plankton are another possibility worth considering (e.g., Grandremy, Bourriau, et al., 2023; Vandromme et al., 2014), given the well‐known effect of prey sizes on the growth and dynamics of small pelagics (e.g., Rykaczewski, 2019; Rykaczewski & Checkley, 2008; Thoral et al., 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2013) found a positive trend in the relative weight of anchovy stomachs from 2003 to 2010. Further, conditions in the Bay of Biscay have become more favorable for anchovy, at least in terms of the abundance of prey (see e.g., Valdés et al., 2021, for a recent review of trends in zooplankton biomass), while extensive analyses based on imaging samples reveal a stable taxonomic composition and spatial structure of the mesozooplankton community (Grandremy, Romagnan, et al., 2023). In that context, we also considered the potential impact of changes in population abundance through density‐dependence.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison of the ZooScan and the ZooCAM highlights their interoperability on the large mesozooplankton size range, reflecting the possibility to combine zooplankton datasets originating from both instruments to expand their spatial and / or temporal coverage (e.g., Grandremy et al 2023). Following this example, efforts should be made to inter-compare and inter-calibrate other imaging systems to evaluate their interoperability and therefore the possibility to assemble existing datasets in order to spatially and/or temporally extend zooplankton ecological studies.…”
Section: The Benefits Of Comparing Zooplankton Imaging Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, besides actual observation, modelling zooplankton remains a challenging task due to the diversity of traits, such as life forms, life cycles, body sizes, and physiological processes, exhibited by zooplankton (Mitra and Davis, 2010;Mitra et al, 2014). However, over the past 2 decades, the development of imaging and associated machine-learning semi-automatic identification tools (Irisson et al, 2022) has greatly improved the capability of scientists to analyse long (Feuilloley et al, 2022), high-frequency (Romagnan et al, 2016) or spatially resolved (Grandremy et al, 2023a) zooplankton time series as well as trait-based data (Orenstein et al, 2022). Imaging and machine learning have particularly enabled the increased development of combined size and taxonomy zooplankton ecological studies (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combined, these datasets make up a 16-year time series of sized and taxonomically resolved zooplankton, along with context metadata allowing the calculation of quantitative data, covering the whole Bay of Biscay continental shelf from the French coast to the continental slope and from the Basque Country to southern Brittany in spring. These datasets can be used for ecological studies (Grandremy et al, 2023a), machine-learning studies and modelling studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%