“…Moreover, in various aqueous electrolytes, the maximum voltage of the NHCC‐air full battery (1.6 V) is higher than that reported for organic‐based batteries (Figure 5d and Table S1), including acid electrolyte (pyrene‐4,5,9,10‐tetraone||MnO 2 on graphite felt (PTO||MnO 2 @GF) (1.3 V), [19] PTO||PbO 2 (1.27 V), [20] polypyrene‐4,5,9,10‐tetraone||Mg x CuHCF (PPTO||Mg x CuHCF) (1.12 V) [20] ), mild electrolyte (PPTO||LiMn 2 O 4 (1.13 V), [20] PPTO||Na 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 (1.18 V) [20] ), and alkaline electrolyte (PPTO||LiCoO 2 (1.3 V), [20] PAQS||Ni(OH) 2 (1.45 V) [20] ). In addition, due to the high concentration of the alkaline aqueous electrolyte and high stable electrochemical kinetics of the NHCC anode materials, the NHCC‐air full battery demonstrate longer cycle life (30,000 cycles at 20 A g −1 ) and higher rate‐capacity (120 mAh g NHCC −1 at 20 A g −1 ) than the reported organic anode batteries (Figure 5e and Table S2), including poly(1, 4‐Naphthoquinone)||O 2 (PNQ||O 2 ), [21] poly(1, 4‐anthraquinone) on carbon nanotubes||O 2 (P14AQ@CNT||O 2 ), [9c] poly(vinylanthraquinone)||O 2 (PVAQ||O 2 ), [9d] poly(1,8‐dihydroxyanthraquinone)||O 2 (PDHA||O 2 ), [9f] and anthraquinone‐based conjugated microporous polymer||Ni(OH) 2 (IER‐11||Ni(OH) 2 ) [9g] . It is also worthing noting that the organic couponds are still facing challengs including low electronic conductivity, and reduced specific capacity than the metal counterpart, further efforts should be paid to these aspects to facilitate this organic compound‐Air battery configuration.…”