2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.06.069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrophobic treatment of woven cotton fabrics with polyurethane modified aminosilicone emulsions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences in chemical composition and porosity reported above can explain the diverse hydrodynamic behavior, especially in terms of moisture uptake. Moreover, the resulting water contact angle strongly depends on the entire surface topography 74 , 75 . Generally, more hydrophilic surfaces are thought to favor cell attachment 76 , but studies have shown that protein can adhere even to more hydrophobic surfaces 77 , especially after increasing the number of seeded cells or culture time 78 80 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences in chemical composition and porosity reported above can explain the diverse hydrodynamic behavior, especially in terms of moisture uptake. Moreover, the resulting water contact angle strongly depends on the entire surface topography 74 , 75 . Generally, more hydrophilic surfaces are thought to favor cell attachment 76 , but studies have shown that protein can adhere even to more hydrophobic surfaces 77 , especially after increasing the number of seeded cells or culture time 78 80 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 A rough surface, caused by nanoparticles, leads to a higher contact angle. Although the hydrophobic property is weaker than that of silk fabrics coated with dopamine and Fe 2+ (contact angle = 150 o ), 39 SiO 2 @KH570 has proven multifunctional properties, which mean it has good prospects for application not only in self-cleaning, oil/water separation and water-repellent fabrics, 4042 but also in protective, non-ironing fabrics.
Figure 7.Hydrophobicity of untreated and treated silk fabrics: (a) Blank, (b) Water, (c) KH570, (d) SiO 2 @KH570.
…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antipilling behavior of modified and control cotton fabrics was evaluated by modified Martindale method ISO 12945-2: 2000 and PillGrade 3D Fabric Scan & Grade System (SDL Atlas Ltd., MI, USA). The samples were placed under standard laboratory conditions (20 °C and 65% R. H) for 24 h before testing [27]. Two thousand pilling cycles were performed for each sample, and the results of five samples were averaged to obtain the pilling grade.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%