2010
DOI: 10.1063/1.3455845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrophobicity effect in the self assembly of particles in an evaporating droplet

Abstract: The prevailing exposition of the particle deposition mechanism in an evaporating droplet for self-assembly does not lead one to expect any deviation in deposition behavior to occur when two different particle types (of differing hydrophobicity) are used while keeping all other key parameters (i.e., particle concentration, particle size, and liquid volume) comparable. It is well known that if the contact angle that the droplet makes with the surface is sufficiently low a “coffee stain” pattern results, and that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lama et al [18] studied crack formation in the ring using silica nanoparticles and polystyrene particles (0.1 μm diameter) of different concentration of [0.1-2.0] % wt and observed larger crack density and ordered cracks on the ring at a larger substrate temperature due to lesser ring height. The particle hydrophobicity can also influence the morphology, as reported by Shao et al [36]. They showed that the hydrophobic particles result in a spoke-like deposit as compared to a typical ring-like deposit due to stronger capillary forces among them [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lama et al [18] studied crack formation in the ring using silica nanoparticles and polystyrene particles (0.1 μm diameter) of different concentration of [0.1-2.0] % wt and observed larger crack density and ordered cracks on the ring at a larger substrate temperature due to lesser ring height. The particle hydrophobicity can also influence the morphology, as reported by Shao et al [36]. They showed that the hydrophobic particles result in a spoke-like deposit as compared to a typical ring-like deposit due to stronger capillary forces among them [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The particle hydrophobicity can also influence the morphology, as reported by Shao et al [36]. They showed that the hydrophobic particles result in a spoke-like deposit as compared to a typical ring-like deposit due to stronger capillary forces among them [36]. Here, too though, there has been little work on examining the occurrence of cracks in a single system over a wide range of concentrations and particle sizes, or quantitative studies of the rings formed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…7b). Multiple ring deposition patterns have been observed before (Shao et al 2010;Deegan 2000), based on sequential pinning and movement of the contact line. We monitored the drying process on both of the surfaces under the contact angle goniometer, but were unable to observe any re-pinning of the contact line.…”
Section: Deposition Patterns On Surfaces With Intermediate Wettabilitmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It is not currently clear what kind of mechanism(s) can lead to different deposition patterns for different solutes, as the basic phenomenon can be theoretically described without taking into account the properties of the solute (Deegan et al 1997). Very recently, Shao et al (2010) provided theoretical modeling and experimental data of drying patterns of hydrophilic versus hydrophobic microspheres (&1 lm, investigated separately). In their study, the main reason for the different drying patterns was related to the interaction of the particles with each other and the fluid at the receding contact line.…”
Section: Deposition Patterns Of Analyte Mixturesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For instance, in inkjet printing, a uniform deposit is desired than the ring-like deposit. In addition to the Marangoni convection, other effects which were found important in controlling the shape of the deposit are pH of the colloidal suspension 12 , particles hydrophobicity 13 , shape of the particles 14,15 , surfactant concentration 16 , substrate elasticity 17 , ambient pressure 18 , particles size 19 and bio-molecular interaction between the particles and substrate 20 . The present study investigates the influence of substrate temperature, substrate wettability and particle concentration on the mechanism of the particles deposition and associated evaporation dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%