Hydroxyapatite-coated implant: Clinical prognosis assessment via a retrospective follow-up study for the average of 3 years

Jung, Junhong; Kim, Sang-Yun; Yi, Yang-Jin; Lee, Bu-Kyu; Kim, Young-Kyun

doi:10.4047/jap.2018.10.2.85

Cited by 19 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Early results with coatings applied to dental implants in the 1990s were not good for various reasons, including detachment of the hydroxyapatite coating and dissolution of the detached HA [131,135]. However, recently coating methods have been improved, and techniques such as ion-sputtering or thermal plasma treatment have been used [136,137]. This has resulted in more durable coatings that adhere better to the titanium substrate and therefore have greater promise for clinical use.…”

Section: Surface Modification Of Titanium Alloysmentioning

confidence: 99%

Titanium Alloys for Dental Implants: A Review

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The topic of titanium alloys for dental implants has been reviewed. The basis of the review was a search using PubMed, with the large number of references identified being reduced to a manageable number by concentrating on more recent articles and reports of biocompatibility and of implant durability. Implants made mainly from titanium have been used for the fabrication of dental implants since around 1981. The main alloys are so-called commercially pure titanium (cpTi) and Ti-6Al-4V, both of which give clinical success rates of up to 99% at 10 years. Both alloys are biocompatible in contact with bone and the gingival tissues, and are capable of undergoing osseointegration. Investigations of novel titanium alloys developed for orthopaedics show that they offer few advantages as dental implants. The main findings of this review are that the alloys cpTi and Ti-6Al-4V are highly satisfactory materials, and that there is little scope for improvement as far as dentistry is concerned. The conclusion is that these materials will continue to be used for dental implants well into the foreseeable future.

show abstract

Section: Surface Modification Of Titanium Alloysmentioning

confidence: 99%

Titanium Alloys for Dental Implants: A Review

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The authors then carry out a systematic review of the results in the literature on the study, the characteristics of this surface. Furthermore, to support the literature, a confocal microscopic analysis of a surface SA [11,12,13,14,15,16]. Implantology (dental) means that set of surgical techniques designed to functionally rehabilitate a patient suffering from total or partial edentulism through the use of dental implants or devices, metallic or not, surgically inserted into the mandibular or maxillary bone, or above it but under the gingiva, acting in turn to allow the connection of fixed or mobile prostheses, for the restitution of the masticatory function.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 89%

Sandblasted and Acid Etched Titanium Dental Implant Surfaces Systematic Review and Confocal Microscopy Evaluation

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The field of dental implantology has made progress in recent years, allowing safer and predictable oral rehabilitations. Surely the rehabilitation times have also been reduced, thanks to the advent of the new implant surfaces, which favour the osseointegration phases and allow the clinician to rehabilitate their patients earlier. To carry out this study, a search was conducted in the Pubmed, Embase and Elsevier databases; the articles initially obtained according to the keywords used numbered 283, and then subsequently reduced to 10 once the inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. The review that has been carried out on this type of surface allows us to fully understand the features and above all to evaluate all the advantages or not related. The study materials also are supported by a manufacturing company, which provided all the indications regarding surface treatment and confocal microscopy scans. In conclusion, we can say that, thanks to these new surfaces, it has been possible to shorten the time necessary to obtain osseointegration and, therefore, secondary stability on the part of implants. The surfaces, therefore, guarantee an improved cellular adhesion and thanks to the excellent wettability all the biological processes that derive from it, such as increases in the exposed implant surface, resulting in an increase in bone-implant contact (BIC).

show abstract

“…The Osstem TS III-HA ® and TSV-HA ® (Zimmer Biomet, Carlsbad, California, USA) products were compared and both exhibited high survival rates, but significant differences in terms of the healing process were achieved after immediate loading (Figure 6). Moreover, peri-implantitis was diagnosed in 2.2% of Osstem TS III-HA ® implants and in 1.4% of TSV-HA ® implants [99]. These models were also evaluated in a retrospective analysis, which reported a survival rate success of 100% and no differences between the two products [100].…”

Section: Current Osteogenic Strategies In Implantologymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Both radiographs are Zimmer ® commercial implants in the same patient. Figure adapted from Cervino [99].…”

Section: Figurementioning

confidence: 99%

Achievements in the Topographic Design of Commercial Titanium Dental Implants: Towards Anti-Peri-Implantitis Surfaces

Asensio

Vázquez‐Lasa

Rojo

2019

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Titanium and its alloys constitute the gold standard materials for oral implantology in which their performance is mainly conditioned by their osseointegration capacity in the host’s bone. We aim to provide an overview of the advances in surface modification of commercial dental implants analyzing and comparing the osseointegration capacity and the clinical outcome exhibited by different surfaces. Besides, the development of peri-implantitis constitutes one of the most common causes of implant loss due to bacteria colonization. Thus, a synergic response from industry and materials scientists is needed to provide reliable technical and commercial solutions to this issue. The second part of the review focuses on an update of the recent findings toward the development of new materials with osteogenic and antibacterial capacity that are most likely to be marketed, and their correlation with implant geometry, biomechanical behavior, biomaterials features, and clinical outcomes.

show abstract

Hydroxyapatite-coated implant: Clinical prognosis assessment via a retrospective follow-up study for the average of 3 years

Cited by 19 publications

References 19 publications

Titanium Alloys for Dental Implants: A Review

Titanium Alloys for Dental Implants: A Review

Sandblasted and Acid Etched Titanium Dental Implant Surfaces Systematic Review and Confocal Microscopy Evaluation

Achievements in the Topographic Design of Commercial Titanium Dental Implants: Towards Anti-Peri-Implantitis Surfaces

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About