2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10856-011-4431-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydroxyapatite coating on magnesium with MgF2 interlayer for enhanced corrosion resistance and biocompatibility

Abstract: Hydroxyapatite (HA) was coated onto pure magnesium (Mg) with an MgF(2) interlayer in order to reduce the surface corrosion rate and enhance the biocompatibility. Both MgF(2) and HA were successfully coated in sequence with good adhesion properties using the fluoride conversion coating and aerosol deposition techniques, respectively. In a simulated body fluid (SBF), the double layer coating remarkably enhanced the corrosion resistance of the coated Mg specimen. The in vitro cellular responses of the MC3T3-E1 pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 4 also demonstrates the effect of calculating the corrosion rate by mass-loss measurements without removing the corrosion products [86] that can lead to a negative rate. The comparability of in vitro corrosion was difficult because the rates were provided in different units, as parts per million (ppm) of Mg ion released to the corrosion solution [85,87], mg/cm 2 day [18,73,88,89], and percentage of weight or volume loss [21,84,[90][91][92] among others. In this study, the corrosion rates were then all converted to mm/year, as this unit is the most frequently used unit observed in the literature.…”
Section: Methods Used To Calculate Corrosion Rates In Vitromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 4 also demonstrates the effect of calculating the corrosion rate by mass-loss measurements without removing the corrosion products [86] that can lead to a negative rate. The comparability of in vitro corrosion was difficult because the rates were provided in different units, as parts per million (ppm) of Mg ion released to the corrosion solution [85,87], mg/cm 2 day [18,73,88,89], and percentage of weight or volume loss [21,84,[90][91][92] among others. In this study, the corrosion rates were then all converted to mm/year, as this unit is the most frequently used unit observed in the literature.…”
Section: Methods Used To Calculate Corrosion Rates In Vitromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to produce thicker deposits, a multilayer deposition could be performed [565]. An AD technique was used to deposit HA onto the surface of Ti [15,596,570], Ti alloys [571], Mg previously covered by either MgF 2 [80] or poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) [572], as well as onto various polymers [573,574]. Namely, to perform AD, HA powder was sprayed onto Mg samples in a deposition chamber using oxygen carrier gas at a flow rate of 5 × 10 -4 m 3 /s under a pressure of 9.2 Torr.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Namely, to perform AD, HA powder was sprayed onto Mg samples in a deposition chamber using oxygen carrier gas at a flow rate of 5 × 10 -4 m 3 /s under a pressure of 9.2 Torr. According to SEM observations, when HA was deposited onto Mg with the PCL interlayer, it was partially embedded into this interlayer, forming composite-like structures [572]; however, when HA was deposited onto Mg with the MgF 2 interlayer, no composite-like structures were observed [80]. In addition, the HA deposits on Mg with the PCL interlayer were found to have better stability during deformation if compared to those on Mg without the interlayer [572].…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This procedure can be performed in acetone Cui et al, 2013;Hiromoto et al, 2008;Hiromoto, Tomozawa, & Maruyama, 2013;Hiromoto & Yamamoto, 2009;Jo et al, 2011;Jo, Li, Kim, Kim, & Koh, 2013;Kannan, 2013;Noorakma, Zuhailawati, Aishvarya, & Dhindaw, 2013;Ohtsu, Hiromoto, Yamane, Satoh, & Tomozawa, 2013; Hu et al, 2010;Gray-Munro & Strong, 2009), and/or autoclaving . The preparation normally consists of cleaning and/or degreasing to remove any sort of surface contamination arising from manufacturing.…”
Section: Brief Discussion Of the Important Predeposition And Postdepomentioning
confidence: 99%