2018
DOI: 10.1111/sjtg.12262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hyper‐planning Jakarta: The Great Garuda and planning the global spectacle

Abstract: After a major flood in Jakarta in 2007, the government of Indonesia partnered with a consortium of Dutch engineers and designers to produce a solution. In 2013, this consortium proposed a plan for the Great Garuda, a megaproject that combined a deep seawall and private real estate, both in an archipelago of reclaimed islands that would be shaped like the mythical garuda eagle, Indonesia's national symbol. Despite a range of infeasibilities and opposition, the Great Garuda became the most prominent vision for t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has not yet been considered by most urban planners. Wade (2019) criticizes Indonesian planners which keep supporting reclamation megaprojects and underestimate other possibilities to address the sinking of Jakarta.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This has not yet been considered by most urban planners. Wade (2019) criticizes Indonesian planners which keep supporting reclamation megaprojects and underestimate other possibilities to address the sinking of Jakarta.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the seawall would provide a new icon for Jakarta, as the overall design of the project would be shaped like the Garuda, a mythical eagle of Indonesia's national symbol. The project is relatively massive as it would involve development of 32 kilometres, 1250 hectares land reclamation, and a 7500 hectares water retention basin (Van Dijk, 2016, Octavianti andCharles, 2018;Wade, 2019). Table 2 shows detailed components of the NCICD project.…”
Section: What Has Jakarta Done?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Faced with the Indonesian government’s apparent unwillingness to commit funding, consultants integrated the use of private–public partnerships into the master plan during the design process, while continuing to encourage the government to commit financially. The reliance on private investment as a “financial fix” (Wade, 2019: 165) had a significant bearing on the master plan; land reclamation became the primary financing mechanism and the centerpiece of the master plan in the form of 1250 ha of reclaimed land in the shape of the Garuda . The design has been credited to Dutch architect Gijs van den Boomen, KuiperCampagnons who, while playing on an iPad in a taxi, noticed that the shape of Jakarta Bay resembled a bird (personal communication, 2015).…”
Section: Productive and Disruptive Frictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many media outlets, which in the absence of sufficient socialization became a primary source of information about the GGSW project, implicitly and explicitly conflated the two. Subsequently, property developers were able to use the project to advance their agendas (see Wade, 2019). For example, Skidmore, Owings, and Merrill LLP (SOM), a firm hired by Indonesian property developer Agung Podomoro Land to develop the master plan for Pluit City claims on its website:SOM’s master plan for two new islands on 450 hectares of reclaimed land off the north coast of Jakarta, Indonesia, creates the first phase of a unique “archipelago” city district to be built in the historic Jakarta Bay.…”
Section: Productive and Disruptive Frictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%