10th AIAA/NAL-NASDA-ISAS International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference 2001
DOI: 10.2514/6.2001-1802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hyper-X stage separation--simulation development and results

Abstract: This

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The procedure was validated by comparing the analysis results with full-scale payload fairing separation test data of the Titan IV launch vehicle. Reubush et al [24] simulated hyper-X stage separation with the Monte Carlo method. Jeyakumar and Biswas [25−27] provided the stage separation system design and dynamic analysis of launch vehicles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure was validated by comparing the analysis results with full-scale payload fairing separation test data of the Titan IV launch vehicle. Reubush et al [24] simulated hyper-X stage separation with the Monte Carlo method. Jeyakumar and Biswas [25−27] provided the stage separation system design and dynamic analysis of launch vehicles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Major objectives of the program are to acquire data on the operation of the scramjet propulsion system and to demonstrate controlled hypersonic flight technologies. 1,2 A secondary goal is to evaluate the experimental [3][4][5][6] and computational [7][8][9][10] techniques used in the design and analysis of the Hyper-X vehicle in order to facilitate future hypersonic and launch vehicle programs. 1,11,12 The flight experiment mission profile is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulation has been run in a Monte-Carlo fashion to estimate the probability of re-contact between the two vehicles and to evaluate the capability of the X-43A control system to limit attitude excursions during separation as well as ensure a proper post-separation vehicle attitude. 10,11 Prior to the 2001 flight, validation of the SepSim tool consisted of modular level checks performed by comparing simulation results with independent standalone models, and one integrated level check that compared results with those from an independent sixdegree-of-freedom RV simulation. This independent simulation modeled the dynamical motion of only the RV during separation by including additional force and moment increments due to the pistons and the aerodynamic interference effects on top of the baseline aerodynamic forces predicted for free flight.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%