1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1992.tb00875.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hyperactivity and Delay Aversion—II. The Effect of Self versus Externally Imposed Stimulus Presentation Periods on Memory

Abstract: The memory of hyperactive and non-hyperactive children for "attended" and "unattended" picture cards was compared under two conditions. Under Self Imposed Presentation (SI) conditions children set their own limits on presentation time while under Externally Imposed Presentation (EI) conditions children were encouraged to spend 30 seconds attending to the cards. Hyperactive children selected shorter presentation times than non-hyperactive children and recognized fewer "attended" cards under SI conditions, while… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of several studies (Sonuga-Barke, Taylor, & Heptinstall, 1992 ;Sonuga-Barke, Taylor, Sembi, & Smith, 1992 ;Sonuga-Barke, Williams, Hall, & Saxton, 1996), SonugaBarke (1995) set forth a model that explains the behaviour of AD\HD children in terms of a pervasive aversion of delay. According to this model, disinhibition in children with AD\HD reflects an attempt to reduce delay and does not arise from the inability to inhibit as such.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of several studies (Sonuga-Barke, Taylor, & Heptinstall, 1992 ;Sonuga-Barke, Taylor, Sembi, & Smith, 1992 ;Sonuga-Barke, Williams, Hall, & Saxton, 1996), SonugaBarke (1995) set forth a model that explains the behaviour of AD\HD children in terms of a pervasive aversion of delay. According to this model, disinhibition in children with AD\HD reflects an attempt to reduce delay and does not arise from the inability to inhibit as such.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of theories have been proposed to account for these core symptoms, including : the optimal stimulation theory (Zentall, 1975 ;Zentall & Zentall, 1983), behaviour inhibition theories (Oosterlaan & Sergeant, 1996 ;Pennington & Ozonoff, 1996 ;Quay, 1997), motivational theories (Barkley, 1989 ;Douglas & Parry, 1994 ;Iabonli, Douglas, & Baker, 1995), information processing theories (Sergeant & Van der Meere, 1990a, b ;Van der Meere, 1996), and the delay aversion theory (Sonuga-Barke, 1994 ;Sonuga-Barke, Taylor, & Heptinstall, 1992 ;Sonuga-Barke, Taylor, Sembi, & Smith, 1992 ;Sonuga-Barke, Williams, Hall, & Saxton, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Plus précisément, le gradient de récompense serait plus court, ce qui conduirait à une dévalorisation des récompenses différées et à une préférence pour des récom-penses immédiates. Les personnes présentant un TDA/H seraient ainsi aversives aux délais [19][20][21].…”
Section: Sonuga-barke Et L'aversion Au Délaiunclassified