2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00039-002-8247-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hyperbolic rank and subexponential corank of metric spaces

Abstract: We introduce a new quasi-isometry invariant corank X of a metric space X called subexponential corank. A metric space X has subexponential corank k if roughly speaking there exists a continuous map g : X → T such that for each t ∈ T the set g −1 (t) has subexponential growth rate in X and the topological dimension dim T = k is minimal among all such maps. Our main result is the inequality rank h X ≤ corank X for a large class of metric spaces X including all locally compact Hadamard spaces, where rank h X is m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To make this question nontrivial, one should stabilize the product by an additional factor which has arbitrarily large dimension and small growth rate, e.g., by R m . It easily follows from results of our previous paper [BS1] that there is no quasi-isometric embedding H n → X, X = T 1 × • • • × T p × R m , for any p ≤ n − 2 and m ≥ 0. For the projection X → T 1 × • • • × T p defines a subexponential foliation of X of rank p = dim(T 1 × • • • × T p ), therefore, the subexponential corank of X is ≤ p, and by the main result of [BS1], the existence of H n → X implies n − 1 ≤ p. In fact, Theorem 1.1 is optimal w.r.t.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To make this question nontrivial, one should stabilize the product by an additional factor which has arbitrarily large dimension and small growth rate, e.g., by R m . It easily follows from results of our previous paper [BS1] that there is no quasi-isometric embedding H n → X, X = T 1 × • • • × T p × R m , for any p ≤ n − 2 and m ≥ 0. For the projection X → T 1 × • • • × T p defines a subexponential foliation of X of rank p = dim(T 1 × • • • × T p ), therefore, the subexponential corank of X is ≤ p, and by the main result of [BS1], the existence of H n → X implies n − 1 ≤ p. In fact, Theorem 1.1 is optimal w.r.t.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…It easily follows from results of our previous paper [BS1] that there is no quasi-isometric embedding H n → X, X = T 1 × • • • × T p × R m , for any p ≤ n − 2 and m ≥ 0. For the projection X → T 1 × • • • × T p defines a subexponential foliation of X of rank p = dim(T 1 × • • • × T p ), therefore, the subexponential corank of X is ≤ p, and by the main result of [BS1], the existence of H n → X implies n − 1 ≤ p. In fact, Theorem 1.1 is optimal w.r.t. the number of trees in the product stabilized by R m .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In our earlier paper [BS1] we introduced another quasi-isometry invariant of metric spaces, called the subexponential corank. This invariant gives an upper bound for the topological dimension of a Gromov hyperbolic space that can be quasi-isometrically embedded into a given metric space X, rank h (X) ≤ corank(X).…”
Section: S Buyalo and V Schroedermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This invariant gives an upper bound for the topological dimension of a Gromov hyperbolic space that can be quasi-isometrically embedded into a given metric space X, rank h (X) ≤ corank(X). Thus, the corank is a useful tool for finding obstructions to such embeddings, and it works perfectly well in many cases; see [BS1] for the details. However, e.g., for quasi-isometric embeddings H n → T 1 × · · · × T k × R m it gives only k ≥ n−2, while hypdim gives the optimal inequality k ≥ n−1 by Corollary 1.2.…”
Section: S Buyalo and V Schroedermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the dimension of G/K, where K is a maximal compact subgroup of G, is a quasi-isometry invariant of G by a theorem of J. Roe [33,Proposition 3.33 and Corollary 3.35]. Other kinds of dimensions that provide quasi-isometry invariants are, among others, asymptotic dimension [18,14], subexponential corank [9], and hyperbolic dimension [10]. Here we focus on the covering dimension of the asymptotic cone, which was considered in Gromov's book [18,Chapter 2], in Burillo's paper [8] and in [24] in the context of solvable groups, in [3] in the case of the mapping class group, in [15] in connection with asymptotic Assouad-Nagata dimension, and in [21] in the context of nonpositively curved manifolds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%