2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2018.05.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hyperbolic tangent function weighted optimal intercept angle guidance law

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[11] employ hyperbolic tangent function as weighting in guidance design. However, the value of this variant of hyperbolic function in [11] grows exponentially with time. A range-aware hyperbolic tangent function is designed in this work to tackle this problem.…”
Section: B Optimal Error Shaping Guidance Lawsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[11] employ hyperbolic tangent function as weighting in guidance design. However, the value of this variant of hyperbolic function in [11] grows exponentially with time. A range-aware hyperbolic tangent function is designed in this work to tackle this problem.…”
Section: B Optimal Error Shaping Guidance Lawsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large acceleration command consumes excessive missile momentum energy, and will result control saturation. In [11], a hyperbolic tangent function weighted guidance law is proposed trying to tackle this problem. However, the value of proposed function grows exponentially with time, thus penalizing mostly impact angle and miss distance error while neglecting acceleration loss.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Homing guidance systems that can implement fire-andforget attacks have been rapidly developed and widely applied [1,2]. In recent years, studies on homing guidance have dealt with constraints in the angle of impact [3], mostly through the employment of optimal control theory [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Moreover, constraints on the maximum acceleration command are also commonly considered [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, if the weighting functions can be chosen arbitrarily, then the flexibility of the pathfollowing guidance design could be largely enhanced. Various weighting functions, such as constant function [16], Gaussian function [17], time-to-go function [18], exponential function [19], hyperbolic tangent function [20], and sinusoidal function [21], have been used to devise terminal guidance laws for different guidance objectives. These weighting functions have their corresponding advantages, for example, reducing sensitivity with respect to initial heading error, extending the operational margin to cope with the external disturbances in the terminal phase, or alleviating the acceleration command at the initial phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%