2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypervelocity impact testing of materials for additive construction: Applications on Earth, the Moon, and Mars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [94,95,98], four samples were fabricated and tested using only Portland and Sorel, three using casting and one using additive construction. The constituents of each sample are shown in Table 5.…”
Section: Manned Missionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [94,95,98], four samples were fabricated and tested using only Portland and Sorel, three using casting and one using additive construction. The constituents of each sample are shown in Table 5.…”
Section: Manned Missionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Testing included impact by a 2 mm sphere travelling at 7 km/s to simulate the potential damage caused by micrometeorites, compression, and visual inspection. Results showed that sample 3 was not as resistant as the others to micrometeorites and they noticed that the lunar regolith cement had shallower penetration depth than the ones with Martian regolith [98,94].…”
Section: Manned Missionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mixtures contained different additives (boric acid, stucco mix, and fly ash) to establish the proper rheology for printing, but the ultimate compressive strength (Fig. 15) was weaker than OPC, and its hypervelocity impact resistance was not ideal for planetary surface environments [29]. Different MgO-based cements are currently under study (e.g., MgO and magnesium chloride, magnesium oxysulfate).…”
Section: Planetary Construction Materials Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Hypervelocity Impact Testing conclusions (Ordonez et al, 2017) • MgO-based cement, in this formulation, is not as resistant to impact as OPC • The projectile did not penetrate as deeply into the JSC-1A simulant-based mortar (compared to the JSC Mars-1A simulant-based mortar) • Establish building codes for planetary structures, and standards for additively constructed materials • Set up an artificial neural network to help optimize these multifaceted, multifunctional materials…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%