2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypofractionated or Conventionally Fractionated Adjuvant Radiotherapy After Regional Lymph Node Dissection for High-Risk Stage III Melanoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have recently published an analysis of the effects of adjuvant RT fractionation on outcomes in 335 patients after resection of high‐risk stage 3 melanoma. 18 There were no significant differences in node field control, RFS or OS between hypofractionated and conventionally fractionated adjuvant RT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have recently published an analysis of the effects of adjuvant RT fractionation on outcomes in 335 patients after resection of high‐risk stage 3 melanoma. 18 There were no significant differences in node field control, RFS or OS between hypofractionated and conventionally fractionated adjuvant RT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The choice between conventionally fractionated RT and hypofractionated RT in the present study was at the discretion of the treating radiation oncologists based on institutional preference and patient choice. We have recently published an analysis of the effects of adjuvant RT fractionation on outcomes in 335 patients after resection of high‐risk stage 3 melanoma 18 . There were no significant differences in node field control, RFS or OS between hypofractionated and conventionally fractionated adjuvant RT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%