1981
DOI: 10.1016/0143-4179(81)90003-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypotensive effects of centrally and peripherally administered neurotensin and neurotensin derivatives in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[D-TrP"l-neurotensin (n=5) had no effect on the dynamics of sinus arrhythmia. This agrees with previous data that modification of the NT molecule by substituting 10-13 amino acid residues considerably reduces the peptide activity [7,8].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…[D-TrP"l-neurotensin (n=5) had no effect on the dynamics of sinus arrhythmia. This agrees with previous data that modification of the NT molecule by substituting 10-13 amino acid residues considerably reduces the peptide activity [7,8].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…14 Injections of substance P into the nucleus tractus solitarius of anesthetized rats resulted in hypotension, 21 whereas central injections of the peptide in conscious rats are normally pressor. 14 In our experiments with conscious animals, neurotensin always gave a pressor response, whereas, in the studies where neurotensin was depressor, 20 -2I animals were pentobarbitone anesthetized and so sympathetic activity was reduced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NT,-,, fragment may undergo a more rapid enzymatic degradation following its central administration effectively reducing the amount that may reach the target tissue. Consistent with these observations, centrally administered NT8-13 was found to be less potent than centrally administered NT in producing hypotension in phenobarbitol-anesthetized rats (51). Overall, both NT and NT,-,, activated the HPA axis while NT,-* failed to increase either ACTH or B.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The differences observed in ACTH and B levels between NT,-,, and the parent molecule, may reflect differences in the pharmacodynamic properties of these two peptides. Differences in the metabolism of these two peptides have already been reported following their central and peripheral administration (20,46,51,52). The NT,-,, fragment may undergo a more rapid enzymatic degradation following its central administration effectively reducing the amount that may reach the target tissue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%