2020
DOI: 10.1107/s2052252520002560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypothesis for a mechanism of beam-induced motion in cryo-electron microscopy

Abstract: Estimates of heat-transfer rates during plunge-cooling and the patterns of ice observed in cryo-EM samples indicate that the grid bars cool much more slowly than do the support foil and sample near the middle of the grid openings. The resulting transient temperature differences generate transient tensile stresses in the support foil. Most of this foil stress develops while the sample is liquid and cooling toward its glass transition T g, and so does not generate tensile sample stress. As the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 stressed foil) and when the grid and foil have both cooled to the temperature of the liquid cryogen. The overall magnitude of the observed motion is consistent with rough estimates of grid-foil temperature differences during cooling (Thorne, 2020). Doming motion is reduced if the liquid ethane temperature used for sample vitrification is increased [e.g.…”
Section: Beam-induced Motion and Choice Of Liquid Cryogensupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8 stressed foil) and when the grid and foil have both cooled to the temperature of the liquid cryogen. The overall magnitude of the observed motion is consistent with rough estimates of grid-foil temperature differences during cooling (Thorne, 2020). Doming motion is reduced if the liquid ethane temperature used for sample vitrification is increased [e.g.…”
Section: Beam-induced Motion and Choice Of Liquid Cryogensupporting
confidence: 73%
“…At low total doses where motion is most rapid with dose, the RMS magnitude of particle motion within a given foil hole is (to within experimental uncertainties) proportional to the diameter of the hole (Naydenova et al, 2020; see Fig. S8), as predicted by Thorne (2020): the doming amplitude h / a , where a is the hole diameter and is the (dimensionless) foil strain released between when the sample initially vitrifies (on the tensile-research papers IUCrJ (2021). 8 stressed foil) and when the grid and foil have both cooled to the temperature of the liquid cryogen.…”
Section: Beam-induced Motion and Choice Of Liquid Cryogenmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Beam-induced movement is most likely caused by pre-existing mechanical stress frozen into the sample that is released upon electron irradiation (Glaeser, 2016;Vinothkumar & Henderson, 2016;Thorne, 2020;Naydenova et al, 2020). By comparison, specimen charging (Glaeser, 2016) appears to play only a minor role (Russo & Henderson, 2018a,b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 b ) (Wieferig et al ., 2021). A theoretical analysis of beam-induced movement based on heat transfer rates during cooling (Thorne, 2020) makes a number of suggestions of how the movement can be reduced, e.g. by appropriate choice of materials for the grid and support film.…”
Section: Beam-induced Movementmentioning
confidence: 99%