1987
DOI: 10.2307/2526578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypothesis Testing with Efficient Method of Moments Estimation

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. Wiley,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
937
0
13

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,479 publications
(956 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
6
937
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, as shown by Stapleton and Young 1984 , the EF and the CEF expectation estimators are robust to measurement error on the positive v alue of the dependent variable, which is not the case for the standard maximum likelihood ML estimator of the tobit model. 18 18 The reason why the standard ML estimator is not consistent in the presence of measurement error is that the estimator of the auxiliary parameter, the variance of the error term, is based in part on the variance of the dependent variable. Since measurement error increases this variance, its estimator is biased upward and this bias is transmitted to the coe cient estimators.…”
Section: Econometric Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, as shown by Stapleton and Young 1984 , the EF and the CEF expectation estimators are robust to measurement error on the positive v alue of the dependent variable, which is not the case for the standard maximum likelihood ML estimator of the tobit model. 18 18 The reason why the standard ML estimator is not consistent in the presence of measurement error is that the estimator of the auxiliary parameter, the variance of the error term, is based in part on the variance of the dependent variable. Since measurement error increases this variance, its estimator is biased upward and this bias is transmitted to the coe cient estimators.…”
Section: Econometric Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, we first construct point estimates of the parameters of (2) using ordinary least squares. Next, following Newey and West (1987), we use the estimated residuals {v i t } to estimate X (Σ ⊗ I T )X, where the matrix X denotes the regressors employed in estimation, and where the (i, j) element of Σ is estimated byΣ = 1 T T t=1v i tv j t . For this just identified estimator, the estimated covariance matrix of our parameter estimates is given by (X X) −1 X (Σ⊗I T )X(X X) −1 .…”
Section: Measuring Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Either one makes additional assumptions to ensure that the variance is as claimed, which is what we propose below, or one has to use more complicated inference methods based on long run variance estimation, Newey and West (1987), or self normalization, Lobato (2001). In fact, the omitted condition appears quite innocuous, so their essential approach seems correct.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%