2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c11203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ab Initio Prediction of the Redox Potentials of 3d Transition Metals Embedded in a Semiconducting Host Lattice

Abstract: Here, we report a theoretical investigation devoted to the ab initio determination of the redox potentials E(D n+ /D n+1 ) of a dopant D in a given host lattice. The knowledge of these potentials is of capital importance to anticipate its attainable oxidation states (versus the synthesis conditions).Hereafter the host lattice has been selected to be the well-known rutile TiO2 compound due to its interest for many applications, the simplicity of its crystal structure and the large number of already collected da… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
(224 reference statements)
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This functional was chosen since it is cost affordable, accurate for structure predictions, and reliable for point defect properties as demonstrated by some of us. 35 The lattice parameters of the ideal m-ZrO 69 The band gap was estimated at 4.14 eV, while a HSE06 70 approach gave 5.28 eV close to already reported GW 0 71 (5.34 eV), HSE 40 (5.22 eV), and EELS 72 (5.3 eV) data. For a HSE06@SCAN calculation (i.e., HSE06 band gap estimated on the fully optimized SCAN structure), we found 5.23 eV in great agreement with the HSE06 value.…”
Section: ■ Methodssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This functional was chosen since it is cost affordable, accurate for structure predictions, and reliable for point defect properties as demonstrated by some of us. 35 The lattice parameters of the ideal m-ZrO 69 The band gap was estimated at 4.14 eV, while a HSE06 70 approach gave 5.28 eV close to already reported GW 0 71 (5.34 eV), HSE 40 (5.22 eV), and EELS 72 (5.3 eV) data. For a HSE06@SCAN calculation (i.e., HSE06 band gap estimated on the fully optimized SCAN structure), we found 5.23 eV in great agreement with the HSE06 value.…”
Section: ■ Methodssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Here, we considered the SCAN functional to estimate defect formation enthalpies (DFEs) for intrinsic defects and Ti impurities. This functional was chosen since it is cost affordable, accurate for structure predictions, and reliable for point defect properties as demonstrated by some of us . The lattice parameters of the ideal m -ZrO 2 unit cell were calculated at a = 5.146 Å, b = 5.226 Å, c = 5.315 Å, and β = 99.32°, close to the experimental values ( a = 5.14422(4) Å, b = 5.20969(5) Å, c = 5.31120(5) Å, and β = 99.220(1)°) .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, ab initio methods can be used to estimate the formation energy of point defects, and to determine their impact on the electronic structure of the ideal material. [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] Surprisingly, from our knowledge, such kind of simulations have not been reported for the Sr 4 Al 14 O 25 compound yet. Herein, we propose to fill this lack by characterizing more than 30 possible intrinsic point defects in this material and to identify the prominent expected ones versus specific synthesis conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%