1989
DOI: 10.1080/00049158.1989.10674540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of existing fine fuel moisture models applied toEucalyptuslitter

Abstract: The diurnal trends in dead leaf, bark and twig moisture content on the floor of a Eucalyptus forest in south-eastern Australia were examined over a four day period. Substantial differences were found in moisture content among the three fuel types. At night the twigs remained the driest, while the leaves, through condensation of dew and distillation of moisture from the soil, were the wettest. During the daytime the leaves and bark reached lower fuel moisture minima than the twigs. The adequacy of several fine … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Applying such relations to combustion processes that lead to more benign goals, such as reducing litter (needles and bark slough with no evidence of decay) and duff layers (decomposed organic matter) to enhance seed germination, is not straightforward. In addition, most fuel moisture algorithms are embedded in fire danger rating systems and consider only daily-varying conditions (McArthur 1966;Deeming et al 1978;Bradshaw et al 1983;Van Wagner 1987;Stocks et al 1989;Viney and Hatton 1989;Viegas et al 1999). This inhibits their use for planning fire at different times of the day.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying such relations to combustion processes that lead to more benign goals, such as reducing litter (needles and bark slough with no evidence of decay) and duff layers (decomposed organic matter) to enhance seed germination, is not straightforward. In addition, most fuel moisture algorithms are embedded in fire danger rating systems and consider only daily-varying conditions (McArthur 1966;Deeming et al 1978;Bradshaw et al 1983;Van Wagner 1987;Stocks et al 1989;Viney and Hatton 1989;Viegas et al 1999). This inhibits their use for planning fire at different times of the day.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It mainly takes the water vapor exchange equation as the main body, and the parameters are obtained through experiments. In addition, the fine fuel moisture code in the Canadian Fire Risk Rating System reflects the dryness of litters; this code also adopts a semiphysical method, has a good extrapolation ability, and is widely used in globally (Viney & Hatton, 1989;Wotton & Beverly, 2007;Anderson & Anderson, 2009). However, because its parameters are obtained from jack pine and lodgepole pine in Canada, whether it is suitable for the typical litter in Yunnan Province still needs to be verified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the aim of this study is to examine the fire danger indices only, a detailed assessment of the moisture and fuel availability models is not presented. Experimental examinations of the FFDI (Viney and Hatton 1989), FFBT (Viney andHatton 1989, Gould et al 2007) and FWI (Simard and Main 1982, Simard et al 1984, Wotton et al 2005) moisture models have been presented elsewhere.…”
Section: The Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%