1966
DOI: 10.1063/1.3048356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomic and Ionic Impact Phenomena on Metal Surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0
1

Year Published

1970
1970
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulation results and the experimental data expressed in the form of the relative gas flow rate G are given in Table 1. The G is related to W cal in the same manner as the mass flow rate G exp , i.e., G ¼ W cal =W diff , where W diff can be calculated using (2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The simulation results and the experimental data expressed in the form of the relative gas flow rate G are given in Table 1. The G is related to W cal in the same manner as the mass flow rate G exp , i.e., G ¼ W cal =W diff , where W diff can be calculated using (2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, the reviews containing the experimental data related to the efficiency of heat exchange between a rarefied gas and a solid body provide an extensive field of non-reproducible results [2]. Thus, for example, for the He-W systems with similar gas and surface temperatures, different researchers obtain the values of energy accommodation coefficients that have a 20-fold difference (0.02 and 0.4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects caused by ion bombardment of solid surfaces are quite numerous and usually rather involved; see for example the review articles by Kaminsky (1965) and Carter and Colligon (1968) which are mainly concerned with bombardment effects of metal surfaces.…”
Section: Review Of the Effects Caused By Ion Bombardment Of Semicondumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calculations by B0ttiger and Winterbon (64) and others (65,66) have shown that a large fraction of the incident ions are reflected away from the surface (see process 6- Figure 1). Their calculations for the reflection coefficient of 4 He + are shown in Figure 17. These results indicate that a significant fraction of the initial kinetic energy is not deposited in the target material.…”
Section: Variation Of the Sputteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electrons can then be treated by statistical mechan- Figure 4. It is convenient to describe the interatomic potential, U(R), with the same functional form as Equation 4. This has been accomplished by Bohr (21) who estimated the interaction energy between two atoms by the formula:…”
Section: U(r)mentioning
confidence: 99%