1989
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.39.4231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

c-axis stress dependence of normal and superconducting state properties ofYBa2Cu3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, we cannot conclude that the application of strain by hydrostatic pressure always yields the most suitable structural manipulation for obtaining the highest T c of the targeted material. The importance of the uniaxial strain for manipulating T c has recently been recognized [7], for example, in YBa 2 Cu 3 O 7 (Y-123) [9][10][11][12][13], YBa 2 Cu 4 O 8 (Y-124) [13][14][15][16][17], and HgBa 2 CuO 4 [18]. Selective structural manipulation by uniaxial strain yields physical information regarding the optimal type of strain for optimizing T c .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, we cannot conclude that the application of strain by hydrostatic pressure always yields the most suitable structural manipulation for obtaining the highest T c of the targeted material. The importance of the uniaxial strain for manipulating T c has recently been recognized [7], for example, in YBa 2 Cu 3 O 7 (Y-123) [9][10][11][12][13], YBa 2 Cu 4 O 8 (Y-124) [13][14][15][16][17], and HgBa 2 CuO 4 [18]. Selective structural manipulation by uniaxial strain yields physical information regarding the optimal type of strain for optimizing T c .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15][16][17] The US-type experiment is technologically more difficult and require high-quality single crystals of sufficient size. The US-type approach has been limited to only combined thermal expansion and specific heat measurements using the Ehrenfest relation dT…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using X-ray-diffraction, Aleksandrov and coworkers [173] [243,244]. The dTc/dcrij values disagree even more [110,183,[245][246][247]. Therefore, an estimate of dTJdP based on theory might reduce the uncertainty in dTcjdP.…”
Section: Monocrystal Srtioamentioning
confidence: 99%