2000
DOI: 10.1119/1.19413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classical Electrodynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2.1). The TE contribution is, in fact, the coupling between the electric polarizability of the atom and the magnetic polarizability of the sphere α sp,M = − a 3 2 1 [19]. To see this, we first remind the reader of the CP interaction between isotropic atoms possessing both electric and magnetic polarizabilities [20],…”
Section: Cp Interaction Between Atom and Conducting Spherementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2.1). The TE contribution is, in fact, the coupling between the electric polarizability of the atom and the magnetic polarizability of the sphere α sp,M = − a 3 2 1 [19]. To see this, we first remind the reader of the CP interaction between isotropic atoms possessing both electric and magnetic polarizabilities [20],…”
Section: Cp Interaction Between Atom and Conducting Spherementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first term U C is the Coulomb interaction and the correction term U B , known as the Breit interaction, has a direct classical analog in the retarded electromagnetic interaction between two charged point particles known as the Darwin Hamiltonian [8]. The equation (11), known as the Breit approximation, is very useful in the calculations of energy shifts for many particles systems.…”
Section: The Operator Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models predict, as summarized in Ref. [33], that binding should occur for 27 Al (100% natural abundance) and 207 Pb (22% natural) but not for 9 Be (100% natural). However, the estimated binding energies, e.g., 0.5-2.5 MeV for aluminum, are large and comparable to shell model splittings, so we believe that in the presence of the monopole the nucleus will undergo nuclear rearrangement and binding should in general result, even for 9 Be.…”
Section: Trapping Of Monopolesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The velocity dependence of this force cancels the 1/(velocity) 2 dependence of the usual charged particle dE/dx. Either classically [27], quantum mechanically [34], or field theoretically [35], approximately one simply substitutes (gβ) 2 for (ze) 2 in the usual charged particle dE/dx formula. Kazama, Yang, and Goldhaber [36] [37,38] has used this crosssection to obtain the following expression for monopole stopping power: 1) where N e is the number density of electrons, I is the mean ionization energy, K(|n|) = 0.406 (0.346) is the Kazama, Yang and Goldhaber correction for magnetic charge n = 1 (n ≥ 2) respectively, δ is the usual density correction and B(|n|) = 0.248 (0.672, 1.022, 1.685) is the Bloch correction for n = 1 (n = 2, 3, 6), respectively [39].…”
Section: Energy Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation