2019
DOI: 10.1111/cgf.13684
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ClustMe: A Visual Quality Measure for Ranking Monochrome Scatterplots based on Cluster Patterns

Abstract: We propose ClustMe, a new visual quality measure to rank monochrome scatterplots based on cluster patterns. ClustMe is based on data collected from a human‐subjects study, in which 34 participants judged synthetically generated cluster patterns in 1000 scatterplots. We generated these patterns by carefully varying the free parameters of a simple Gaussian Mixture Model with two components, and asked the participants to count the number of clusters they could see (1 or more than 1). Based on the results, we form… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
84
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
2
84
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples are Normalized Stress [7], Trustworthiness and Continuity [24], and Distance Consistency (DSC) [25]. More recently, ClustMe [26] was proposed as a perception-based measure that ranks scatterplots based on cluster-related patterns. While this might be useful for quick overviews or automatic selection of projections, a single score fails to capture more intricate details, such as where and why a projection is good or bad [27].…”
Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples are Normalized Stress [7], Trustworthiness and Continuity [24], and Distance Consistency (DSC) [25]. More recently, ClustMe [26] was proposed as a perception-based measure that ranks scatterplots based on cluster-related patterns. While this might be useful for quick overviews or automatic selection of projections, a single score fails to capture more intricate details, such as where and why a projection is good or bad [27].…”
Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, projection quality metric can be used to assess the quality of each projection by using PCA or t-SNE. This includes global measures such that Normalized Stress, Distance Consistency, ClustMe [85] , or local measures such as projection precision score [86] can contribute to shedding light on the quality of such projections. Nevertheless, it should be noted that such assessment may also be misleading and cannot contribute towards comprehending why such results occurred .…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, papers such as those by Bernard et al [BHZ*18, BZSA18], Gang et al [GRM10], and Kucher et al [KPSK17], although undoubtedly interesting, are out of the scope of our survey, since their research contributions are exclusively based on labeling data. Other partially‐related papers [AASB19, AW12, BHGK14, FBT*10, SBTK08, ZSCC18] are also not included because they focus on using clustering solely to explore the data, without addressing inherent problems of the method. For similar reasons, the paper by Wenskovitch et al [WCR*18], that tries to connect and aggregate benefits from clustering and DR methods, was excluded.…”
Section: Methodology Of the Literature Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%