“…Isolates LARS 909 and 938 (G3) were identical to the ones obtained from Stylosanthes spp., and isolates from G4 (LARS 912,913,917,924,927,931,and 940) differed by two nucleotides from those in Stylosanthes spp., and by only one nucleotide from those on A. virginica, M. indica or C. melo. Different regions (D1, D2) of the LSU rDNA and intergenic sequences (ITS1, ITS2) have more variation in their rate of evolution than do the domains of the small subunit, being useful to distinguish groups in closely related taxa, like in the genus Colletotrichum Kohn, 1992;Moses et al, 1996;Moriwaki et al, 2002). Sherriff et al (1994; observed that sequence data from the D2 region was as informative as the combined D1, D2 and ITS2 regions (886 bp) in revealing the differences and relationships in Colletotrichum, since it has a sufficient proportion of sequence divergence to distinguish between the main species of this genus.…”