<i>Encyclopedia of Volcanoes</i>

Sigurdsson, Haraldur; Houghton, B. F.; McNutt, Stephen R.; Rymer, Hazel; Stix, John; McBirney, Alexander R.

doi:10.1063/1.1325206

Cited by 306 publications

(164 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

146

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Subsequently they have been applied also in other areas of CPR, especially by authors of this paper. Naturally, principles of facies analyses developed by Maleev [9,13] have been further elaborated along with advances in classification and understanding of volcaniclastic rocks [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] (and relevant references in these textbooks). Detailed geological mapping with recognition of volcaniclastic rock facies has served as a basis of facies analysis.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the case of most volcanological terms, a consensus has been reached and we follow terminology used by prominent authors of textbooks and reviews [13,14,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][28][29][30][31][32][33]. As far as volcanic forms are concerned, such a consensus has not been always reached with those authors, and we shall define each type of volcanic form before proceeding with its characterization in the CPR.…”

Section: Terminologymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Neogene-Quaternary Volcanic forms in the Carpathian-Pannonian Region: a review

et al. 2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Neogene to Quaternary volcanic/magmatic activity in the Carpathian-Pannonian Region (CPR) occurred between 21 and 0.1 Ma with a distinct migration in time from west to east. It shows a diverse compositional variation in response to a complex interplay of subduction with roll-back, back-arc extension, collision, slab break-off, delamination, strike-slip tectonics and microplate rotations, as well as in response to further evolution of magmas in the crustal environment by processes of differentiation, crustal contamination, anatexis and magma mixing. Since most of the primary volcanic forms have been affected by erosion, especially in areas of post-volcanic uplift, based on the level of erosion we distinguish: (1) areas eroded to the basement level, where paleovolcanic reconstruction is not possible; (2) deeply eroded volcanic forms with secondary morphology and possible paleovolcanic reconstruction; (3) eroded volcanic forms with remnants of original morphology preserved; and (4) the least eroded volcanic forms with original morphology quite well preserved. The large variety of volcanic forms present in the area can be grouped in a) monogenetic volcanoes and b) polygenetic volcanoes and their subsurface/intrusive counterparts that belong to various rock series found in the CPR such as calc-alkaline magmatic rock-types (felsic, intermediate and mafic varieties) and alkalic types including K-alkalic, shoshonitic, ultrapotassic and Na-alkalic. The following volcanic/subvolcanic forms have been identified: (i) domes, shield volcanoes, effusive cones, pyroclastic cones, stratovolcanoes and calderas with associated intrusive bodies for intermediate and basic calc-alkaline volcanism; (ii) domes, calderas and ignimbrite/ash-flow fields for felsic calc-alkaline volcanism and (iii) dome flows, shield volcanoes, maars, tuffcone/tuff-rings, scoria-cones with or without related lava flow/field and their erosional or subsurface forms (necks/ plugs, dykes, shallow intrusions, diatreme, lava lake) for various types of K-and Na-alkalic and ultrapotassic magmatism. Finally, we provide a summary of the eruptive history and distribution of volcanic forms in the CPR using several sub-region schemes.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Terminologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Neogene-Quaternary Volcanic forms in the Carpathian-Pannonian Region: a review

et al. 2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Earth observation from space, gravimetry,…) have allowed both ground deformation and gravity variations that occur before, during and after events volcanic to be measured with a precision, spatial and temporal coverage unimaginable a few decades ago (Fernández et al, 1999;Sigurdsson et al 2000;Gottsmann et al, 2006;Dzurisin, 2007;Battaglia et al, 2008, Crossley et al, 2013. These innovative observational techniques have entailed developing new methods of data processing and interpretation (theoretical models and inversion techniques), allowing rigorous and objective information to be obtained from these new observations.…”

Section: Sensors and Techniques Developed In Recent Years In The Diffmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Geodetic monitoring is an integral 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 4 part of this monitoring system, complementing different seismic, geophysical and geochemical techniques (see e.g., Sigurdsson et al, 2000, Dzurisin, 2007Pérez and Hernández, 2008).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

An Overview of Geodetic Volcano Research in the Canary Islands

Fernández

González

Camacho

et al. 2014

Pure Appl. Geophys.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In particular, huge amounts of H 2 S are emitted from volcanic and hydrothermal systems (e.g. D' Alessandro et al, 2013;Hernandez et al, 2015), where this gas may represent a significant hazard for human health (Sigurdsson et al, 2015). For example, in 1971For example, in , 1976For example, in and 1997 people were likely asphyxiated by H 2 S emitted from the Kusatsu-Shirane and Adatara volcanoes (Honshu, Japan) (Cook and Weinstein, 2011;Williams-Jones and Reimer, 2015).…”

Section: Origin Of Hydrogen Sulfide (H 2 S) and Its Impact On Human Hmentioning

confidence: 99%