2021
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.22420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FAT4 identified as a potential modifier of orofacial cleft laterality

Abstract: Orofacial clefts (OFCs) are common (1 in 700 births) congenital malformations that include a cleft lip (CL) and cleft lip and palate (CLP). These OFC subtypes are also heterogeneous themselves, with the CL occurring on the left, right, or both sides of the upper lip. Unilateral CL and CLP have a 2:1 bias towards left‐sided clefts, suggesting a nonrandom process. Here, we performed a study of left‐ and right‐sided clefts within the CL and CLP subtypes to better understand the genetic factors controlling cleft l… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed a yield of 17.6% in CP and 9.09% in CLP cases, but only a 2.80% yield in CL cases, the latter of which was not significantly different from controls. Our results reinforce the etiologic heterogeneity in OFC subtypes observed recently from multiple genome-wide association studies 45; 58-61 and extend it to rare variants. They also suggest that when choosing to pursue clinical sequencing, proband cleft type might be a consideration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…We observed a yield of 17.6% in CP and 9.09% in CLP cases, but only a 2.80% yield in CL cases, the latter of which was not significantly different from controls. Our results reinforce the etiologic heterogeneity in OFC subtypes observed recently from multiple genome-wide association studies 45; 58-61 and extend it to rare variants. They also suggest that when choosing to pursue clinical sequencing, proband cleft type might be a consideration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The idea that genetically related individuals also tend to have the same type of OFC more often than different types of OFCs, has been rarely utilized in running GWASs of OFC subtypes. Individual level phenotypic heterogeneity in terms of laterality and gender‐effects has been analyzed to investigate genetic heterogeneity in previous studies on the Pitt‐OFC subjects (Curtis, Chang, Lee, et al, 2021; Curtis, Chang, Sun, et al, 2021). However, these variables were not incorporated in our study—as our sample is already subdivided into smaller samples based on the OFC subtypes observed in families, further subsetting by gender and/or laterality would lead to subsets too small for running GWAS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Liu et al ( 95 ) described an interaction between the PRICKLE1 and FOCAD loci for cranial base width underlying a variance quantitative trait locus (QTL) at PRICKLE1 . With respect to craniofacial disease, three distinct modifiers of nsCL/P subtypes have been discovered in the last few years: the FAT4 locus for cleft laterality ( 34 ), the PAX1 locus for bilaterality versus unilaterality ( 33 ), and a third locus for cleft palate ( 16 ).…”
Section: Common Variation In Craniofacial Shapementioning
confidence: 99%