2005
DOI: 10.1086/497574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FUSEDetermination of a Low Deuterium Abundance along an Extended Sight Line in the Galactic Disk

Abstract: We present a study of the deuterium abundance along the extended sight line toward HD 90087 with the Far Ultraviolet Spectroscopic Explorer (FUSE ). HD 90087 is a O9.5 III star located in the Galactic disk at a distance of $2.7 kpc away from the Sun. Both in terms of distance and column densities, HD 90087 has the longest and densest sight line observed in the Galactic disk for which a deuterium abundance has been measured from ultraviolet absorption lines so far. Because many interstellar clouds are probed al… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
54
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(91 reference statements)
3
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These measurements strengthen the argument that these high ratios cannot be due to some systematic problem associated with the different analyses (see also discussion below) or that they are peculiar cases. In particular, it has been argued that the high D/H ratios found in the ISM could be due to systematic effects that affect the N(H i) measurements (Hébrard et al 2005). Because the D/O ratios derived for these two sight lines are also high and independent of N(H i), the high D/ H ratios are likely due to a high abundance of D and not to a systematic problem with the N(H i) determination (see also discussion in x 7.1).…”
Section: Implications For Models That Explain D/h Variationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These measurements strengthen the argument that these high ratios cannot be due to some systematic problem associated with the different analyses (see also discussion below) or that they are peculiar cases. In particular, it has been argued that the high D/H ratios found in the ISM could be due to systematic effects that affect the N(H i) measurements (Hébrard et al 2005). Because the D/O ratios derived for these two sight lines are also high and independent of N(H i), the high D/ H ratios are likely due to a high abundance of D and not to a systematic problem with the N(H i) determination (see also discussion in x 7.1).…”
Section: Implications For Models That Explain D/h Variationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…References.-(1) Hébrard et al 1999;(2) Hébrard & Moos 2003;(3) Dring et al 1997;(4) Linsky et al 1995;(5) Wood et al 1996;(6) Wood et al 2000; (7) Wood et al 2002b;(8) Piskunov et al 1997;(9) Wood et al 2002a;(10) Hébrard et al 2002;(11) Kruk et al 2002;(12) Lemoine et al 2002;(13) Vennes et al 2000;(14) Oliveira et al 2005;(15) Lehner et al 2002;(16) Oliveira et al 2003;(17) York & Rogerson 1976;(18) York & Kinahan 1979;(19) Sonneborn et al 2002;(20) Allen et al 1992;(21) Gry et al 1985;(22) This work; (23) Friedman et al 2002;(24) Hébrard et al 2005;(25) Ferlet et al 1980;(26) Meyer et al 1998;(27) York 1983;(28) Sonneborn et al 2000;(29) Jenkins et al 1999;(30) Bluhm et al 1999;(31)...…”
Section: Implications For Models That Explain D/h Variationsunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The dispersion (by a factor of 3) which has been found in the measurements (Linsky et al 2006) makes it hard to interpret the data in the context of standard GCE models. It has been suggested (Hébrard et al 2005, Linsky et al 2006 that either the lowest (see also text by G. Hébrard, this volume) or the highest (see also text by J. Linsky, this volume) observed abundances are indicative of the actual value of the deuterium abundance in the local ISM (LISM). However, neither of these values can be reproduced by GCE models in agreement with all the major observational constraints for the solar neighbourhood (Romano et al 2006).…”
Section: Deuteriummentioning
confidence: 98%
“…(1) Cyburt et al (2008); (2) Pettini et al (2008); (3) Geiss & Gloeckler (1998); (4) Linsky et al (2006); (5) Hébrard et al (2005); (6) Prodanović et al (2009); (7) Bania et al (2002); (8) Gloeckler & Geiss (1996); (9) Peimbert et al (2007); (10) Steigman (2007); (11) Asplund et al (2009). can not be reproduced by the models, independently of how many low-mass stars burn their 3 He on the RGB.…”
Section: Referencesmentioning
confidence: 98%