Hablas vielleicht un peu la mia language?A comprehensive overview of the role of language differences in headquarters–subsidiary communication

Abstract

The management of human resources in headquarters (HQ)-subsidiary relationships requires intensive communication, but effective communication often depends on having a shared language. Hence, language differences can be a serious threat to the successful management of human resources in multinational corporations (MNCs). In this large-scale quantitative study, encompassing data from more than 800 subsidiaries in thirteen countries, we investigated four related issues. First, in terms of the importance of language differences, we found that HQ-subsidiary relationships are clearly affected by language differences and that the latter form a distance category of their own, which should not be subsumed under the related, but separate concept of cultural differences. Second, regarding the consequences of language differences for communication outcomes, we found that a lack of a shared language is associated with misunderstanding, conflict and parallel information networks which could harm HQ-subsidiary interactions. Third, with regard to the impact of language differences on communication methods, we found that a lack of a shared language is associated with a significantly lower level of oral (face-to-face and phone) communication, but not written communication. Fourth, and finally, in terms of a potential solution to communication problems caused by language differences, we found that expatriates can facilitate both communication and knowledge transfer between HQ and subsidiaries.

From bilingualism to multilingualism in the workplace: the case of the Basque Autonomous Community

“…Harzing and her colleagues (Feely and Harzing 2002;Harzing et al 2011;Harzing and Pudelko 2013) carried out a series of mainly quantitative studies that look into the 'language barrier' in multinational companies, which refers to language differences that lead to communication problems. Feely and Harzing (2002) distinguish three dimensions of the language barrier: (1) language diversity, i.e.…”

Language in International Business: A Review and Agenda for Future Research

“…Firm-level research focuses on language competencies, policies, and practices within MNCs (e.g., Harzing and Pudelko 2013), including HQ-subsidiary relationships (Harzing et al 2011;Harzing and Pudelko 2014) and mergers, acquisitions, and alliances (Joshi and Lahiri 2014;Cuypers et al 2015). These studies investigate the impact of linguistic diversity on social identity formation (e.g.…”

Organising multilingually: setting an agenda for studying language at work

“…Language has moved from being treated as an operative and peripheral issue to becoming a strategic concern for a growing number of IB researchers (Luo and Shenkar, 2006). Recent research has shown how language diversity in multinational corporations (MNC) affects core management processes such as effectiveness of communication (Harzing and Pudelko, 2014), knowledge transfer between subsidiary units (Peltokorpi and Vaara, 2014;Reiche et al, 2015) and overall sense of belongingness and cohesion among geographically dispersed employees (Neeley, 2017). IB research often takes a structuralist, design-based view of the organisation and illustrates well the complex co-existence of multiple languages at work.…”