2008
DOI: 10.1002/nme.2419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

hp‐Generalized FEM and crack surface representation for non‐planar 3‐D cracks

Abstract: SUMMARYA high-order generalized finite element method (GFEM) for non-planar three-dimensional crack surfaces is presented. Discontinuous p-hierarchical enrichment functions are applied to strongly graded tetrahedral meshes automatically created around crack fronts. The GFEM is able to model a crack arbitrarily located within a finite element (FE) mesh and thus the proposed method allows fully automated fracture analysis using an existing FE discretization without cracks. We also propose a crack surface represe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
143
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
143
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Earlier attempts have been made on this subject in the context of the generalized finite element method (G-FEM) [18,12], but in the case where the interface is represented explicitly. Here, an Comparison between p refinement and h extension.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Earlier attempts have been made on this subject in the context of the generalized finite element method (G-FEM) [18,12], but in the case where the interface is represented explicitly. Here, an Comparison between p refinement and h extension.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other possibility would consist in vectorizing the assembly process, as proposed in [52]. We are currently improving the numerical efficiency of the proposed approach by replacing on the fly the integration cells by means of a local Delaunay tetrahedralization, following [18]. Concerning non-linear material behaviour, Nitsche's stabilization parameter should be recomputed at each iteration, which could be cumbersome.…”
Section: Numerical Cost Of the Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations