We record XPS spectra while applying 0 to +10 V or 0 to À10 V square pulses to the sample rod, which normally results in twinning of all peaks at correspondingly increased (for +10 V) or decreased (for À10 V) binding energies. For poorly conducting samples, like silicon oxide layer on a silicon substrate, the twinned peaks appear at different energies due to differential charging, which also vary with respect to the frequency of the applied pulses. Moreover, the frequency dependence varies with the thickness and can be correlated with the capacitance of the oxide layer. The technique is simple and can lead to extract important information related with dielectric properties of surface structures in a totally non-contact fashion. Ó 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.Keywords: X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy; Differential charging; Silicon dioxide layers; Capacitance X-ray photoelectron spectra are normally recorded while the samples are electrically tied to the spectrometer ground to avoid disturbances due to contact potentials and/or charging. Even then, positive charging (commonly referred as surface charging or differential charging) is unavoidable in analysis of poorly conducting samples as a result of incomplete neutralization [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Use of a lowenergy electron flood gun, for neutralization, has been very successful for most applications [7,8]. Over-neutralization (using the flood gun) leading to excess negative charging is also encountered.Utilization of surface charging (mostly negative) phenomenon, for elucidating chemical and/or structural parameters of various materials, has also been reported. Lau and coworkers [9][10][11][12][13][14][15] have published several articles, dealing with various structural and electrical properties of ultrathin dielectric films on semiconductors using surface charging. Thomas et al. [16] were able to separate various electrically uncoupled regions on an integrating circuit surface using the surface charging effect; and similar applications were also reported by Ermolieff et al. [17] and Bell and Joubert [18]; while Miller et al. applied the technique to separate the XPS signals of the fiber from the exposed matrix at fractured surfaces [19]. Use of surface charging for lateral differentiation of mesoscopic layers and for depth profiling in 1-10 nm thin layers have also recently been reported [20,21]. By adopting a different strategy, we have also reported that by application of a small (1-10 V) bias we can control the differential charging to obtain a variety of analytical information about surface structures [23][24][25].The technique of biasing the sample goes back (three decades) to the early days of XPS [1,2]. However, use of it for extracting chemical and/or structural information is not extensive. In a recent application Havercroft and Sherwood [22] showed that biasing the sample holder, with a large negative d.c. voltage (25-100 V), could be used to identify chemical differences in oxide films on an aluminum alloy. In our previous reports ...