1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb04795.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impedance of Pacemaker Leads: Correlation of Different Methods

Abstract: This study compares three different pacing system analyzers, which measure impedance at different points during an impulse, with measurements telemetered from implanted pacemakers from four different manufacturers. Measurements were obtained at the time of implantation in a group of 103 patients. The measurements obtained by these different methods differ significantly from each other; the later during the impulse the impedance is measured, the higher in general its value. Interpretation of impedance values sh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The ε and δ I values of these electrodes were minimal and maximal, respectively. The pacemaker telemetric error was ε ex ≈ 20% [6,7,12]. For electrodes listed in Table 1 (except electrode No.…”
Section: A Dubrovskiimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The ε and δ I values of these electrodes were minimal and maximal, respectively. The pacemaker telemetric error was ε ex ≈ 20% [6,7,12]. For electrodes listed in Table 1 (except electrode No.…”
Section: A Dubrovskiimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rectangular voltage pulses U = 4 V (pulse time, t p = 5 msec; pulse repetition period, T = 400 msec) were applied to the electrodes. U and t p values are typical of impedance measurement [6,7]. To mini mize the effect of δ U , C d was selected to be 100 μF.…”
Section: A Dubrovskiimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Schließlich wurde die intraoperative Impedanz mit verschiedenen Meßanalysegeräte bestimmt. Während dies in einer früheren Untersuchung zu unterschiedlichen Impedanzwerten führte (17), ließ sich in der vorliegenden Untersuchung kein signifikanter Unterschied zwischen den Geräten feststellen.…”
Section: Diskussionunclassified