Unless transplantation of a-hydroxylase containing tissue can be established as treatment for Refsum's disease, cascade filtration appears to be the treatment of choice in order to avoid loss of albumin and to reduce the loss of immunoglobulin G.
This study compares three different pacing system analyzers, which measure impedance at different points during an impulse, with measurements telemetered from implanted pacemakers from four different manufacturers. Measurements were obtained at the time of implantation in a group of 103 patients. The measurements obtained by these different methods differ significantly from each other; the later during the impulse the impedance is measured, the higher in general its value. Interpretation of impedance values should take into account the technique of measurement.
When a pacemaker is implanted, several electrophysiological parameters are measured using pacing system analyzers (PSA). Different PSAs may use different filter settings and measuring techniques when compared to the implanted pacemaker. In order to determine if there were significant differences in measurements obtained with different PSAs, we obtained measurements in a group of 99 patients with three different PSAs and a manual method. The results show that with each of the three different PSAs tested, different amplitudes of intracardiac electrograms are obtained and that they are usually higher than those obtained by manual measurement of recorded electrograms. Despite significant differences, however, all methods correlate well with each other. Following common practice of pacemaker programming, the use of a PSA for the implantation of a pacemaker that uses different sensing technique does not lead to clinical complications.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.