2001
DOI: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00982.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

InSitu Densification Behavior in the Pyrolysis Consolidation of Amorphous Si‐N‐C Bulk Ceramics from Polymer Precursors

Abstract: In situ consolidation of amorphous Si-N-C ceramics during pyrolysis of polymer precursor provides a way to consolidate bulk silicon nitride based ceramics at lower temperatures. Porosity evolution during polymer-ceramic conversion has been investigated to clarify the densification process. A densification mechanism based on surface reaction and pyrolysis accommodated by viscous flow has been proposed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
31
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…the total amount of porosity) and not to the cell size. [22] While the transient porosity which forms upon pyrolysis in the polymer-to-ceramic conversion temperature interval (roughly 600 to 800°C) is in the micro-and meso-range (< 2 nm and between 2 and 50 nm, respectively), and tends to be removed upon further heating (due to pore shrinkage aided by the formation of active radicals and viscous flow), [23] the macro-porosity generated by this process cannot be eliminated, due to its much larger length scale, and thus remains within the resulting ceramic body. Occasionally, some cracks were observed in the structure of some of the produced porous ceramic monoliths, caused by stresses originating from several factors, including the large volume of gas released and a possible non homogeneous distribution of the two silicone precursors (PDMS and silsequioxane) within the unfired, dense body.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the total amount of porosity) and not to the cell size. [22] While the transient porosity which forms upon pyrolysis in the polymer-to-ceramic conversion temperature interval (roughly 600 to 800°C) is in the micro-and meso-range (< 2 nm and between 2 and 50 nm, respectively), and tends to be removed upon further heating (due to pore shrinkage aided by the formation of active radicals and viscous flow), [23] the macro-porosity generated by this process cannot be eliminated, due to its much larger length scale, and thus remains within the resulting ceramic body. Occasionally, some cracks were observed in the structure of some of the produced porous ceramic monoliths, caused by stresses originating from several factors, including the large volume of gas released and a possible non homogeneous distribution of the two silicone precursors (PDMS and silsequioxane) within the unfired, dense body.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past years, the effects of pore-opening and pore shrinkage [2][3][4][5]14,[17][18][19] as well as the effect of addition of thermally-labile polymer on porous structure have been reported. For instance, Kusakabe et al 4 and Li et al 5 prepared SiCbased membranes by pyrolyzing PCS mixed with thermallylabile polymer, polystyrene PS to further increase H 2 permeance.…”
Section: 15mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19,[66][67][68][69] This approach takes advantage of the transient porosity generated upon heat treating a preceramic polymer in the temperature range at which the polymer-to-ceramic conversion occurs (generally 400-800 • C). 4,70 The build-up of internal pressure in the component, provoked mainly by the decomposition of the organic moieties in the preceramic polymer (with generation typically of CH 4 and H 2 gas) leads to porosity (with pore size typically below 50-100 nm). This (micro-)porosity is however transient, because it is eliminated (and thus the SSA value is drastically reduced) when the pyrolysis temperature leading to the completion of the ceramization process is increased, according to a densification mechanism based on surface reaction/pyrolysis accommodated by viscous flow.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%