2018
DOI: 10.1039/c8ra06568c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ combined analysis of gases and electrochemical signals of an activated carbon-based supercapacitor at 2.7–4 V

Abstract: Charging supercapacitors with high purity activated carbon provided different gas information and suggested the decomposition of salt prior to the solvent (PC).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ni 3 (HITP) 2 has a significantly smaller stable voltage window of ˜1-1.5 V, compared to ˜2.5-2.7 V for YP-50F porous carbon (Figure 3c and Table 1). [67,[85][86][87][88][89][90][91] As a result, despite the comparable specific capacitance of Ni 3 (HITP) 2 , it has both a lower energy and power density compared to YP-50F porous carbon, as both quantities are dependent on the square of the operating voltage window. This drawback is also seen in many other 2D MOFs, with all MOFs that have been studied with organic electrolytes in the literature having lower stable voltage windows than porous carbons (Table 1).…”
Section: Electrolytementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ni 3 (HITP) 2 has a significantly smaller stable voltage window of ˜1-1.5 V, compared to ˜2.5-2.7 V for YP-50F porous carbon (Figure 3c and Table 1). [67,[85][86][87][88][89][90][91] As a result, despite the comparable specific capacitance of Ni 3 (HITP) 2 , it has both a lower energy and power density compared to YP-50F porous carbon, as both quantities are dependent on the square of the operating voltage window. This drawback is also seen in many other 2D MOFs, with all MOFs that have been studied with organic electrolytes in the literature having lower stable voltage windows than porous carbons (Table 1).…”
Section: Electrolytementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the solvent, gaseous decomposition products from non-aqueous electrolytes (e.g., ACN, PC) include hydrogen, ethene, propene, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, metaboric acid, and alkylboranes. [16] While the last two are related to the salt (e.g., Et 4 NBF 4 , Et 3 MeNBF 4 ), most of the gas evolution stems from solvent decomposition (e.g., hydrolysis of solvents in the negative compartment or electrochemical oxidation of solvent and carbon surface functional groups), [21][22][23] with ACN being more prone to gas evolution than propylene carbonate (PC). [24] With the above in mind, after determining the physicochemical and electrochemical properties of the SPBF 4 /ACN electrolyte against other conductive ACN-based analogues ( Size (nm) [13] 0 monitor the pressure evolution under ambient conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5,16] These degradation reactions occur at the interface of carbon electrode and electrolyte. As for the electrolyte side, many groups have reported the decomposition of electrolyte solvents [2,6,17,18] and electrolyte salts, [5,17,19,20] based on the results obtained by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, [5,17,21] nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, [5] infrared spectroscopy, [17] gas chromatography, [12,19] mass spectrometry, [6] energy dispersion Xray fluorescence spectroscopy, [14] and scanning electron microscopy. [14] On the other hand, there have been not many papers reporting the origin of degradation reactions at the carbon electrode side in organic electrolytes which are used for commercial supercapacitors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%