2017
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2016.12.0981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ Degradation Patterns of ‘Tifton 85’ Bermudagrass with Dried Distillers’ Grains Supplementation

Abstract: Season of forage growth and supplementation have the potential to affect digestion and animal performance. The objectives were to evaluate the ruminal digestion kinetics of 'Tifton 85' bermudagrass (T85) [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. × C. nlemfuënsis Vanderyst] as affected by seasonality and rate of supplemental dried distillers' grains with solubles (DDGS). Samples were harvested in June, August, and October 2014. Six ruminally-fistulated steers were allocated to three pens. Pens (experimental unit) were rando… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The level of rumen degradability of CP can be variable between different forage species, which determines the availability of ammonia nitrogen in the rumen, and the proportion of amino acids from the diet and microbial protein, that reach the intestine, which are directed to tissue protein synthesis (25) . The concentration of crude protein is higher at the vegetative stages of forages and decline at the flowering stage, which may vary depending on differences between species, initial level of protein in the plant, stem and leaf proportions, content of fiber components in the cell wall and ambient temperature (15,21) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The level of rumen degradability of CP can be variable between different forage species, which determines the availability of ammonia nitrogen in the rumen, and the proportion of amino acids from the diet and microbial protein, that reach the intestine, which are directed to tissue protein synthesis (25) . The concentration of crude protein is higher at the vegetative stages of forages and decline at the flowering stage, which may vary depending on differences between species, initial level of protein in the plant, stem and leaf proportions, content of fiber components in the cell wall and ambient temperature (15,21) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NDF colonization time (lag) (0.69 h) increased, leading to a decline in the rate of passage (1.14%/h) at the highest cutting ages. The colonization time of the fiber fraction represents the time between the start of incubation and ruminal degradation and is associated with the ability of rumen microorganisms to attach to the particles (21) , increasing when there is a greater proportion of lignified cell wall in the forage, makes it difficult for microorganisms to adhere. Associated with this effect, there is a reduction in ruminal degradation of the fiber fraction, as observed in this study, which can affect the ruminal passage rate and negatively imply the intake of DM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Estimated parameter values of kudzu were similar to average values obtained from various forage species as reported by Mertens and Loften (1980), with a slightly lower rate of digestion on fibre content. Additionally, estimated D 0 and k d values for DM were greater than Tifton 85 bermudagrass as reported by Smith et al (2017). Meanwhile, both D 0 and U values of NDF or ADF were smaller than bermudagrass and lag time was also much shorter.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…With modeling, IV and IS techniques can bring together measures of fiber, which are laboratory measures, to in vivo apparent digestibility and intake, which are animal-influenced measures, as a proxy to expensive and time- and labor-consuming feeding trials, which require much larger amounts of feedstuffs and more animal experimental units. Ranking of IV or IS results can help determine forages in breeding programs that are most suitable for advancement ( Foster et al, 2007 ), impact of genetic traits on potential animal performance ( McCuistion et al, 2017 ), the ideal maturity stage for harvest ( Foster et al, 2012 ), harvested forage preservation method ( Foster et al, 2011 , 2012 ), harvested forage preservation aids such as enzyme or microbial applications before ensiling ( Thomas et al, 2013 , 2014 ; McCuistion et al, 2017 ; Foster et al, 2019 ), alternative uses of row crop residues ( Foster et al, 2012 , 2019 ), supplementation regimes ( Smith et al, 2017 ), and among many other applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%