“…[12,14,15,17,18,19,20,21,29,30] Among these, several showed low affinities, NPY(Y 1 ) receptor subtype selectivities or stabilities. Of those remaining, we chose to directly compare five different peptide analogues regarding their metabolic stability (Figure 1), representing the most promising agents in terms of in vitro properties (NPY(Y 1 )R affinity, Table 1, and receptor subtype selectivity) within their respective group of linear, cyclic and dimeric truncated NPY analogues: i) linear [Pro 30 ,Lys(DOTA) 31 DOTA = (1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetrayl)tetraacetic acid), serving as reference compound with known low metabolic stability but high NPY(Y 1 )R affinity and receptor subtype selectivity, [18] ii) [Pro 30 ,Lys(DOTA) 31 ,Bip 32 ,Leu 34 ]NPY [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] (2), a variant of 1 comprising an artificial Bip (biphenylalanine) amino acid in position 32 instead of tyrosine, [12] and Lys(DOTA) in position 31 for radiolabeling, [15] iii) [Lys(lauroyl) 27 ,Pro 30 ,Lys (DOTA) 31 ,Bip 32 ,Leu 34 ]NPY [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] (3), a variant of 2 modified with an additional N ɛ -Lys-lauroyl in position 27 for full receptor agonism and high NPY(Y 1 )R af...…”