2016
DOI: 10.1177/1947603515617280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vivo Evaluation of the Potential of High-Frequency Ultrasound for Arthroscopic Examination of the Shoulder Joint

Abstract: Objective. Accurate arthroscopic evaluation of cartilage lesions could significantly improve the outcome of repair surgery. In this study, we investigated for the first time the potential of intra-articular ultrasound as an arthroscopic tool for grading cartilage defects in the human shoulder joint in vivo and compared the outcome to results from arthroscopic evaluation and magnetic resonance imaging findings. Design. A total of 26 sites from 9 patients undergoing routine shoulder arthroscopy were quantitative… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As our results suggest, the ICRS score has limitations in reliably assessing repair results, and thus more objective methods should be developed. Several novel arthroscopic methods have been introduced to assess the severity of damage in hyaline cartilage, including mechanical testing of cartilage stiffness, 15,16 high-frequency ultrasound, 10,26 mechanoacoustical testing, 11,12 optical coherence tomography, 20 and electromechanical testing. 2,29,30 These methods could possibly make the arthroscopic assessment of cartilage repair more accurate and reliable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As our results suggest, the ICRS score has limitations in reliably assessing repair results, and thus more objective methods should be developed. Several novel arthroscopic methods have been introduced to assess the severity of damage in hyaline cartilage, including mechanical testing of cartilage stiffness, 15,16 high-frequency ultrasound, 10,26 mechanoacoustical testing, 11,12 optical coherence tomography, 20 and electromechanical testing. 2,29,30 These methods could possibly make the arthroscopic assessment of cartilage repair more accurate and reliable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the advancement of modern ultrasound technology, smaller transducers such as those used in the endoscopic applications [ 46 ] with a high-resolution cartilage imaging is also possible, by which more spatial information of the cartilage can be obtained such as the surface roughness [ 17 ]. Among them, the intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) with a very small profile has been demonstrated to be applicable for the characterization of cartilage degeneration [ 47 49 ] and is very potential for this purpose. On the other hand, water-jet was successfully applied as an indentation medium to compress the cartilage in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, as in previous studies in which the UA technique has been applied in human knee and shoulder joints, ultrasound evaluation of the articular cartilage was found to be clinically feasible. 12 , 14 Furthermore, visualization of the cartilage inner structures and subchondral bone and determination of quantitative ultrasound parameters reflecting the status of the articular cartilage, as well as measurement of cartilage thickness, were found to be straightforward during a routine arthroscopic examination of the hip joint. Because ultrasound imaging can be conducted in real time during the arthroscopic surgical procedure, the technique might be a valuable tool aiding in the selection of the optimal repair technique based on the status of the joint at the time of surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome the limitations of current clinical diagnostic methods, an ultrasound arthroscopy (UA) technique was recently introduced for objective assessment of the knee and shoulder joints. 11 , 12 Ultrasound imaging enables evaluation of the integrity of the cartilage surface, subsurface structures, and subchondral bone, as well as accurate measurement of cartilage thickness and depth of cartilage lesions. 13 , 14 In addition, quantitative ultrasound parameters reflecting the integrity of the articular cartilage can be determined.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%