2015
DOI: 10.3997/1873-0604.2015015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

L‐ and CORNER‐arrays for 3D electric resistivity tomography: an alternative for geophysical surveys in urban zones

Abstract: Three‐dimensional electric resistivity tomography surveys carried out on heavily urbanized areas represent a cumbersome task since buildings, houses, or other types of obstacles do not allow parallel electric resistivity tomography lines to be deployed. This paper proposes applying any four‐electrode configuration to provide subsurface information in complex urban areas. Such a procedure allows acquiring information beneath a construction by simply surrounding the structure of interest by a series of electric … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
41
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…These obstacles are reflected in the shallower portion (down to a maximum depth of 2.7 m) of the electrical image (Figure 12), where high and low-resistivity anomalies of small dimensions are detected. In addition, the profile coincided with four concrete injection points (large high-resistivity anomalies below 3 m of depth; anomaly centres at X = 10, 32, 50 and 70 m), derived from the geotechnical engineering works carried out in 2009 to reinforce the soil, provide stability to the temple and stop its deterioration and continuous fracturing caused by processes of differential subsidence (Santoyo, 2010).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These obstacles are reflected in the shallower portion (down to a maximum depth of 2.7 m) of the electrical image (Figure 12), where high and low-resistivity anomalies of small dimensions are detected. In addition, the profile coincided with four concrete injection points (large high-resistivity anomalies below 3 m of depth; anomaly centres at X = 10, 32, 50 and 70 m), derived from the geotechnical engineering works carried out in 2009 to reinforce the soil, provide stability to the temple and stop its deterioration and continuous fracturing caused by processes of differential subsidence (Santoyo, 2010).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The water in this lake was mostly saline. So, highly water-saturated clay soils are usually found at an average depth of 4 to 6 m (Barrera and Islas, 2013;Santoyo, 2010). The continuous water extraction and drying of the lake have produced several subsidence problems in this region throughout the city's history.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…), which can be measured by the same device with the addition of various optional sensors. Although three-dimensional moisture measurements have been conducted previously [21][22][23], the ease of electrode installation and removal is an essential feature of the present device, making it attractive for multi-unit use in the agricultural field. By implementing the described system, farmers can significantly improve the efficiency of agricultural irrigation, leading to more food production with less water.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some small artifacts appear in the result in the vicinity of strong working faces (near anomaly A1) and near anomaly A3. Because of the inherent loss of sensitivity in the center of the pillar, the detection capability of A3, as suggested by Tejero-Andrade et al (2015), should be lower. In this study, we assume that the favorable context of our synthetic model facilitates the detection of A3.…”
Section: Numerical Testmentioning
confidence: 99%