“…They note, for instance, that negative metastereotypes can yield positive consequences if they are “perceived as a challenge or opportunity, [thereby] producing motivating effects,” whereas positive metastereotypes can produce outcomes similar to those arising from ABST, to the extent that a person “feels pressure to live up to expectations he or she may not believe are achievable” (2014, p. 420). More generally, although some have suggested that positive metastereotypes might have beneficial effects on intergroup interactions by making them seem more desirable (Matera, Verde, & Meringolo, 2015), others counter that even positively valenced metastereotypes can be detrimental to people engaged in (or contemplating) intergroup interactions, particularly if these positive metastereotypes are difficult to access (Vázquez, Yzerbyt, Dovidio, & Gómez, 2016). In part, Vezzali (2017) suggests, this is because simply perceiving oneself as being stereotyped—even positively—can “undermine control over one’s behavior, prescribe the behavior that can be exhibited, and threaten the need for personal distinctiveness” (p. 249; see also Vorauer, 2006, pp.…”