2001
DOI: 10.1086/320819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medical Innovation Revisited: Social Contagion versus Marketing Effort

Abstract: This article shows that Medical Innovation-the landmark study by Coleman, Katz, and Menzel-and several subsequent studies analyzing the diffusion of the drug tetracycline have confounded social contagion with marketing effects. The article describes the medical community's understanding of tetracycline and how the drug was marketed. This situational analysis finds no reasons to expect social contagion; instead, aggressive marketing efforts may have played an important role. The Medical Innovation data set is r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
307
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 539 publications
(315 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
6
307
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Because social influence is a theoretical edifice in multiple subfields of the discipline, a growing chorus of authors has critiqued the empirical literature for its inattention to the challenge of establishing evidence of causal social influences in observational data (e.g., Winship and Morgan 1999;Van den Bulte and Lilien 2001;Mouw 2003;Reagans, Zuckerman, and McEvily 2007;Aral, Muchnik, and Sundararajan 2009;Stuart and Sorenson 2009;Shalizi and Thomas 2011). The principal empirical challenge arises because the outcomes that interest researchers often are endogenous to the factors that spur the formation of social ties.…”
Section: Social Influence In Partially Deliberate Matchesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because social influence is a theoretical edifice in multiple subfields of the discipline, a growing chorus of authors has critiqued the empirical literature for its inattention to the challenge of establishing evidence of causal social influences in observational data (e.g., Winship and Morgan 1999;Van den Bulte and Lilien 2001;Mouw 2003;Reagans, Zuckerman, and McEvily 2007;Aral, Muchnik, and Sundararajan 2009;Stuart and Sorenson 2009;Shalizi and Thomas 2011). The principal empirical challenge arises because the outcomes that interest researchers often are endogenous to the factors that spur the formation of social ties.…”
Section: Social Influence In Partially Deliberate Matchesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, we use the lagged social network variable in accordance with Manski (1993) and other work that has studied the impact of the social network effect on user behavior (Van den Bulte and Lilien 2001, Iyengar et al 2010 Lagging avoids the simultaneity problem, unless (1) people are forward-looking not only about their own behavior but also that of others and (2) social ties over which influence flows are symmetric (Hartmann et al 2008, Iyengar et al 2010. The first condition is quite unlikely in large networks such as ours, and the second condition does not hold in our data.…”
Section: Identification Of the Social Network Endogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, Sinha and Chandrashekaran (1992) studied individual adoption behavior using hazard modeling on empirical data. Subsequently, Van den Bulte and Lilien (2001) used hazard modeling to study social contagion with social network data. Bronnenberg and Mela (2004) and Bell and Song (2007) have done this with spatial data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%