2021
DOI: 10.1080/14786419.2021.1937152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mentha aquatica L. aerial parts: in vitro anti-proliferative evaluation on human tumour and non-tumour cell lines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For all experiments, aliquots of each essential oil were diluted in DMSO (100 mg/mL) followed by serial dilution in complete medium affording the final concentrations of 0.15, 1.5, 15, 25, 50, and 150 µg/mL, depending on the experiment. As previously reported (Sobreiro et al 2023;de Souza et al 2022;da Silva et al 2020), final concentration of DMSO (≤ 0.15%) did not affect cell viability. Doxorubicin (0.015, 0.15, 1.5, and 15 µg/mL) was diluted in the same way.…”
Section: Sample Preparationsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For all experiments, aliquots of each essential oil were diluted in DMSO (100 mg/mL) followed by serial dilution in complete medium affording the final concentrations of 0.15, 1.5, 15, 25, 50, and 150 µg/mL, depending on the experiment. As previously reported (Sobreiro et al 2023;de Souza et al 2022;da Silva et al 2020), final concentration of DMSO (≤ 0.15%) did not affect cell viability. Doxorubicin (0.015, 0.15, 1.5, and 15 µg/mL) was diluted in the same way.…”
Section: Sample Preparationsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Using these curves, two effective concentrations representing the sample concentration required to promote 50% (GI50) and total (TGI) growth inhibition of each cell line was calculated by sigmoidal regression using Origin 8.0 software. (Monks et al 1991;de Souza et al 2022).…”
Section: Anti-proliferative Activity Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The influence on cell growth of selected samples was evaluated following the protocol described by Monks et al [ 12 ] with adaptations [ 13 ]. In 96-well plates, CHO-K1 cells (4 × 10 4 cell mL −1 , 100 µL well −1 ) were exposed to each sample (0.25, 2.5, 25 and 250 µg mL −1 , final concentrations) for 4 and 48 h. In the 4 h exposure experiment, after the first 4 h, the medium was removed, and CHO-K1 cells were kept in fresh complete medium for 20 h. A T0 plate representing the cell density at the time of sample treatment was made (T0 untreated cells ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results were plotted as cell growth versus sample concentration curves. Using these curves, one effective concentration representing the sample concentration required to promote 50% of growth inhibition (GI 50 ) of each cell line was calculated by sigmoidal regression 30,31 using Origin 8.0 software.…”
Section: Characterization Of Phenolic Fractionsmentioning
confidence: 99%