Currently, there is no Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) disk diffusion method for testingMoraxella catarrhalis susceptibility. We examined 318 clinical strains of M. catarrhalis obtained as part of the SENTRY (Asia-Pacific) Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, plus two ATCC strains. MICs were determined by the CLSI standard broth microdilution method, and zone diameters were determined on Mueller-Hinton agar incubated in 5% CO 2 . All strains were examined for the presence of BRO-1 and BRO-2 -lactamases by using molecular techniques. Tentative zone diameter interpretive criteria were successfully developed for 19 antimicrobial agents, including nine -lactams, using current MIC interpretive criteria where available or wild-type cutoff values where no prior criteria were available. The proposed interpretive criteria were highly accurate, with <0.7% very major (falsely susceptible) and <1.0% major (falsely resistant) errors, respectively.Moraxella catarrhalis is a common commensal and occasionally pathogenic bacterium associated with a range of infections of the respiratory tract, including acute otitis media, acute sinusitis, and acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (5,22,34). Less commonly, this organism can cause more serious and invasive infection, including pneumonia, septicemia, and meningitis (4, 28). A number of standards-setting organizations, including the Société Française de Microbiologie (29) and the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (http://www .bsac.org.uk/susceptibility_testing.cfm), have developed disk diffusion tests and interpretive criteria for M. catarrhalis. Recently, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Subcommittee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing published an interpretive guideline (6), but only for broth microdilution tests, using criteria essentially the same as those applied to Haemophilus spp. (10). Routine testing was not recommended by CLSI at the time of development of those guidelines.However, this species is frequently isolated from respiratory tract infection specimens and, when present in large numbers, can be assumed by the laboratory to be playing a pathogenic or copathogenic role and, therefore, can be reported to the clinician. For the many international laboratories using CLSI methods and standards, the lack of a disk diffusion method and interpretive criteria limits their ability to communicate useful information to the clinician for a common potential pathogen. We followed CLSI M23-A3 guidelines (7) for the development of a disk diffusion test for M. catarrhalis, supplemented with molecular tests for some resistance mechanisms to assist in the future enhancement of interpretive criteria.(This work was presented in part at the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Munich, Germany, 2007.)
MATERIALS AND METHODSIsolates. Clinical strains of M. catarrhalis isolated from lower respiratory tract specimens and blood cultures were collected in 17 diagnostic laboratories in nine countries par...