2015
DOI: 10.1136/vr.h5754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mycobacterium microti detection in French wildlife

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we found that in some localizations M. microti or M. bovis presence was exclusive, cohabitation of the two MTBC species could be observed at least at a population level in bTB high burden areas in Dordogne (bTB hotspot 1). Until present, co-infection in a same animal was not demonstrated here or in any other French animal [2,8,9]. For two foxes, 170831039977 and 180814038269, we could not confirm the mycobacterium identity due to a low DNA concentration.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although we found that in some localizations M. microti or M. bovis presence was exclusive, cohabitation of the two MTBC species could be observed at least at a population level in bTB high burden areas in Dordogne (bTB hotspot 1). Until present, co-infection in a same animal was not demonstrated here or in any other French animal [2,8,9]. For two foxes, 170831039977 and 180814038269, we could not confirm the mycobacterium identity due to a low DNA concentration.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…However, in the last years, an increasing number of cases were described in pets (cat and dog), zoo animals, camelids and, also, in humans [2][3][4][5]. In France, Mycobacterium microti interferes with the diagnosis of bovine TB (bTB) and has been identified through the surveillance system in livestock (cattle and goats) [6][7][8] and in wild animals (wild boars and badgers) [2,9]. The presence of this pathogen was also described in wildlife in other European countries [10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No outbreak was detected between 2016 and 2018, and there were only two in 2019. However, this department is a hotspot of M. microti infection in wildlife [4,11]. Indeed, the surveillance system in wildlife allowed us to identify an increasing number of cases in badgers and wild boars in the last years.…”
Section: Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, infection by this bacterium was described in a large number of other animal species [3]. Recently, an increasing number of M. microti infection cases was identified in France through Sylvatub [2], highlighting the potential interference in the surveillance and diagnosis of bTB [4]. Moreover, in France, M. microti was also identified in farmed animals, i.e., a goat [5] and a cow [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mycobacterial species causing tuberculosis in humans and animals are part of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) [1], which includes Mycobacterium microti, a microorganism initially identified in England as a pathogen of wild rodents, such as field voles (Microtus agrestis), wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus), bank voles (Myodes glareolus) and shrews (Sorex araneus) [2][3][4][5][6][7]. This pathogen causes natural infections in a wide range of wild and domestic animals, but in recent years, an increasing number of infections have been described in pets (cats and dogs) [8][9][10][11], wildlife (wild boar and badger) [12][13][14][15][16] and livestock (goat and cattle) [17][18][19][20]. In humans, M. microti is rarely reported as a zoonotic agent; however, its full pathogenic potential has not yet been defined [11,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%